The DWI Process From Start to Finish in Texas

February 27, 2013

By Collin County Criminal Defense Lawyer Jeremy Rosenthal

texasdefensefirm.com

(972) 369-0577

Today I’ll discuss the process of a drunk driving arrest as concisely as I can.  I’ll resist the urge to geek out on specifics for the sake of giving you the big picture.

The Initial DWI Arrest

These cases almost always start with an arrest on the roadside.  An officer needs “probable cause” based on “articulable fact” to make an arrest for DWI.  In other words the law requires he have enough underlying facts he can describe simply to avoid profiling, guessing, or arresting based on a “hunch.”  Most arrests include field sobriety tests plus questioning on the roadside by the officer.  The officer’s decision is highly subjective as one would think.  Virtually all roadside DUI arrests are videotaped today.

DWI Defined

DWI is defined by Texas Penal Code Section 49.04 which says a person is guilty of DWI if they operate a motor vehicle in a public place while intoxicated.  “Intoxication” is legally defined as (a) not having the normal use of mental faculties; (b) not having normal use of physical faculties; or (3) having a blood/ alcohol concentration of 0.08 or greater.  The cause of the intoxication must be because of a substance induced into the body or a combination thereof.

The Breath Test

Chapter 724 of the Texas Transportation Code affords people the right (if we want to call it that) to provide a breath or blood specimen.  In theory, the right to take a breath test or blood test could prevent officers from framing and arresting people they simply don’t like.

I’ll save my editorials about the breath test for other blogs (like this one, this one, and this one).

The breath test machine requires you to give two samples.  If both are over 0.08, the officer should confiscate your plastic driver’s license and replace it with a yellow sheet of paper which acts as your temporary driving permit (called a DIC-25).  The DIC-25 is valid for 40 days or until your Administrative Law Review hearing (“ALR”) should you decide to appeal the suspension.

If your result is below a 0.08 your drivers license should not be suspended or confiscated.  You can still be prosecuted for Driving While Intoxicated however, because the officer can still testify you did not have the normal use of your mental or physical faculties due to alcohol and/or drugs.

Blood Warrants

The Courts have liberalized law enforcement’s ability to apply for a search warrant to draw blood under Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Chapter 18.  This means police may try to seek a warrant for an involuntary blood draw from a judge.  These warrants are not automatic and can be fought-against later.  The blood generally takes several weeks (or months) to analyze.

Being Free on Bond

Once you are released from jail, you are said to be “on bond.”  This means you were released by the county in question on the condition you return to face charges in court when they are ultimately filed by the District or County Attorney’s Office.  

The Judge in your case may monitor your activities while you are free on bond.  The most common form of monitoring is through an interlock ignition device (also called deep lung device or “DLD” for short).  A DLD is a breath device which will not allow you to start your car if you have been drinking.  DLD’s are required a condition of bond under Texas Code of Criminal Procedure 17.441 if a person has a prior DWI arrest.  In addition, a judge may order a DLD on a first arrest if they believe it to be in the best interest of justice.  Judges are becoming far more aggressive about ordering DLDs as a condition of bond in recent years.

The Driver’s License Suspension, ALR, and Occupational License

A DWI can be split into two proceedings after the arrest — the ALR and the criminal case.  The ALR, as discussed above, is an administrative hearing when you appeal the officer’s decision to arrest you for DWI.  You have 15 days to appeal this decision to the Texas Department of Public safety from the date of arrest.

If you do not appeal or the appeal is denied you can apply for an Occupational Driver’s License (“ODL”).  An ODL is available for most people on a first DWI arrest and has limitations on a second or more DWI arrest.  The ODL can allow you to drive for up to 12 hours a day for work, office or household tasks.

The Criminal Case — Court Dates

Almost all DWI arrests result in charges being filed by the District or County Attorney’s Office.  Courts will require the Defendant be present one or multiple times in Court to see their case is resolved.  

Resolving Criminal Cases

Cases are typically resolved one of three ways.  Cases are resolved by guilty pleas, by trials or by dismissals.  

Dismissals for DWI Arrests

Dismissals for DWIs in Collin, Dallas, Tarrant and Denton Counties are extremely rare.  This is because groups such as MADD put a great deal of pressure on these offices to prosecute cases regardless of their strength.

DWI Trials

Many DWI cases go to trial and most lawyers (myself included) will tell you those cases are very winnable even with facts that look bad.  A guilty verdict obviously results in a conviction and a not-guilty verdict will allow someone to expunge an arrest.

DUI arrests are the most commonly tried cases in misdemeanor courts in Collin County.  DWI trial is almost it’s own skill in trial advocacy and most trials take between one and three days.  The trial includes jury selection, cross examination and arguments.

If both the Defense and the State agree, a judge instead of a jury can decide the case.

Guilty Pleas

Most cases are resolved through guilty pleas.  You can read herehere (DWI 2nd arrest), and here about the punishment for DWI cases upon guilty pleas or convictions at trial.  By statute, the prosecutors cannot offer deferred adjudication to resolve DWI cases.  Some counties will change charges to “obstruction of a roadway” which is also a class b misdemeanor, but carries far less requirements after conviction and which can be sealed from the public.

Post-Conviction

If you’ve been convicted for DWI in Texas, regardless of whether you received probation, you are responsible to pay the Texas Department of Public Safety a sur-charge for 3 years to keep your driver’s license.  

If there was no breath or blood specimen, your annual fee is $1,000 per year.  If it is a 2nd DWI conviction, it is $1,500 per year.  For a blood/ alcohol concentration above a 0.16, the fine is $2,000 per year.

DWI arrests which result in convictions cannot be expunged or non-disclosed.  Convictions can be used to enhance (or increase) future punishment for future arrests.

 


Texas DWI Roadblocks

July 13, 2010

By Dallas and Collin County Criminal Defense Lawyer Jeremy Rosenthal

texasdefensefirm.com

(972) 562-7549

The Texas legislature has been conducting hearings lately on DWI and DUI enforcement.  While some groups are calling for restraint and understanding in enforcement, other groups are still convinced the only way to lessen DWI’s are through move invasive police tactics — specifically through DWI roadblocks.  This Dallas Morning News article details the discussions.

Here’s what the law says about DWI roadblocks in Texas:

1.  There is no current statute on the books which allows a police agency to set up a DWI roadblock.  A police agency or political subdivision of the state (such as a city or a county) does not have the legal authority to implement one on their own.  Only the State of Texas can pass such a law for enforcement here.  See State v. Holt, 887 S.W.2d 16 (Tex.Crim.App. — 1994). Texas law does allow police to create checkpoints for driver’s license checks, however, those checkpoints cannot be used as an excuse, ruse, or pretext for a sobriety checkpoint.  See King v. State, 816 S.W.2d 447 (Tex.App. — Dallas, 1991).

2.  Any DWI or sobriety checkpoint must satisfy a well-established three-pronged balancing test or else it violates the Fourth Amendment to the U.S Constitution and Article I, Section 9 of the Texas Constitution’s prohibition against unreasonable search and seizure.  the prongs are:  (a) the interest of the state in preventing accidents caused by drunk drivers; (b) the effectiveness of DWI roadblocks in achieving such goal, and (c) the level of intrusion on an individual’s privacy.  Brown v. Texas, 443 U.S. 47 (1979), and State v. Van Natta, 805 S.W.2d 40 (Tex.App. — Ft. Worth, 1991).

The Bottom Line

A DWI, DUI, or sobriety checkpoint or roadblock is not per-se unconstitutional in Texas, however it’s been so hard to conduct legally that agencies wanting to do so must “go back to the drawing board.”  The biggest short-coming according to cases such as Van Natta is that the State has a very difficult time justifying the intrusion into people’s lives where there is no evidence that DWI road-blocks are effective in attaining the goal of reducing drunk driving.  This is not to say that such evidence does or does not exist — but it was not presented to the Courts deciding these cases.

It would be interesting to know from the hearings in Austin whether the people in question asking for the authority to conduct roadblocks have any data which shows checkpoints reduce DWI’s.  If the best argument the advocates can muster is “just because it’s time to get tough,” it looks like they’ll get sent back to the drawing board yet again.

*Jeremy Rosenthal is Board Certified in Criminal Law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization and licensed by the Supreme Court of Texas. Nothing in this article is intended to be legal advice.  For legal advice for any specific situation, you should directly consult an attorney.