Police are Getting Theft Warrants for Shoplifting During the COVID Pandemic

October 6, 2020

By Criminal Defense Attorney Jeremy Rosenthal

jeremy@texasdefensefirm.com

(972) 369-0577

There are currently a glut of warrants for theft in Collin County from shoplifting cases.

Why?  Because during the beginning of the pandemic, police did not want to take folks to jail for shoplifting.  Police were under marching orders to keep the jail clear and police were like anyone else who didn’t want to ride with a stranger in a car for 20 minutes if they didn’t have to.

You can check Collin County Warrants here.  The warrant page says all warrants may not be visible to the public.  If a warrant is not visible it’s typically because of some organized crime ring where they round up the entire group at once.  Shoplifting theft cases don’t fit this profile.

Why Are They Getting Warrants Months and Months Later?

People are required to go to jail in most criminal cases – even if it’s just to book in then out.  The reason is simple — if criminal court were voluntary, no one would come.  The law doesn’t allow people to be prosecuted in absentia so that means the courts have to have some way to compel you to come.  They make you come to court by holding the threat of jail over your head.

Because they didn’t take someone to jail in the first place in March, April, or May – they now have to do it in September or October.

 

How are They Doing This?

Police are asking judges to sign arrest warrants based on probable cause affidavits.  All a probable cause affidavit lays out is the “probable cause” for the charge.  The judge then signs the warrant which allows police to arrest a person.  Criminal charges come later in this scenario.

Another way arrest warrants are triggered is where the District Attorney’s office files the actual criminal charges.

Are They Going to Come and Get Me if I Have a Shoplifting Warrant?

Legally they can but they might not.  They may not have the resources to resolve this glut of cases and they may just be satisfied for folks to either turn themselves in or for the warrant to sit dormant until someone gets pulled over at some point in the future.

A person with an active arrest warrant should always do their best to promptly resolve the warrant by turning themselves in, however.  Not only is it required by law but as I tell clients by turning yourself in with a plan to bond – you are in control and can minimize how long you’re in jail.  I tell clients an arrest will happen at the worst and most inconvenient time if they don’t resolve it promptly (like when you’re on a big date or on your way to your kids soccer game).

Most warrants like this already have a bond amount set in advance so you might not even have to wait for a judge.  Also, most shoplifting cases don’t particularly carry bond amounts which are extraordinarily high.  There is a good chance you are in and out of jail regardless of your financial condition.

Does This Make My Case Worse?

No.  The prosecutor will ultimately file charges and the vast majority of shoplifting cases are misdemeanors.  They carry a range of options which allow for expunctions or ways to get your record cleared.  I’ve handled so many theft cases I can’t count them all.  I can safely say how the person was apprehended never makes a difference in the case – unless, of course there was a fight or something like that.

There is an excellent chance of getting theft off your record depending on your personal history and the facts of the case through an expunction or non-disclosure.

*Jeremy Rosenthal is board certified in criminal law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization.  He is recognized as a Super Lawyer by Thomson Reuters.  Jeremy is a senior partner at Rosenthal, Kalabus & Therrian, PLLC.  www.texasdefensefirm.com.


They Got the “Owner” Wrong on the Indictment

October 29, 2019

By Collin County Criminal Defense Lawyer Jeremy Rosenthal

(972) 369-0577

www.texasdefensefirm.com

A question I get from time to time in theft cases is the “owner” of the property as alleged by the prosecution is not really the owner at all.  Sometimes it is someone whose name the accused doesn’t recognize at all

So Who Is the Person They’re Saying is the Owner?

It is often a loss prevention officer of the store or often an office holder if the ‘victim’ of the theft is a company or organization of some type.

Tex.Code.Crim.P. 1.07(35) defines an owner as a person who has title to the property, possession of the property, whether lawful or not, or a greater right to possession of the property than the actor.

When the perpetrator is attaining property in an unauthorized manner — they have no interest in the property therefore any other person even with minimal control of the property can be considered an “owner.”

Does it Really Matter Who the State Lists as the Owner?

Not usually.  Take most shoplifting cases — the “owner” of the property is typically listed as a loss prevention person or in some instances even the store itself.  It often isn’t contested.

But Here’s Where This Issue Can Get Weird:

Let’s say the person listed as the owner of the property in the indictment (or information in a misdemeanor) normally has less interest in the property than the accused.  For instance, the treasurer of an organization is accused of theft and a regular member is listed as the owner (but was perhaps the informant).

In that instance, the prosecution would argue the treasurer was stealing – so therefore they have no interest in the money stolen whereas the regular member has minimal interest — but still more than the stealing treasurer.  But the counter-argument is Treasurer is presumed innocent as a matter of law, so what you get are “chicken & egg” arguments on either side.

Just a legal pit I’ve fallen into several times over the years!

*Jeremy Rosenthal is an Attorney Licensed in Texas.  He is Board Certified in Criminal Law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization and is a 2019 Super Lawyer as designated by Thomson Reuters.


Theft Amount Classifications Changes Effective September 1, 2015

August 29, 2015

By Collin County Criminal Defense Lawyer Jeremy Rosenthal

(972) 369-0577

texasdefensefirm.com

For the first time in 22 years, the Texas Legislature has adjusted the threshold values for theft cases to adjust for inflation.  Theft is a result-oriented offense and the value of the property stolen typically dictates the punishment level.  As of September 1, 2015, the amounts correlating to specific charges are as follows:

  • Less than $100 is a Class C misdemeanor (formerly less than $50).
  • $100 but less than $750 is a Class B misdemeanor (formerly between $50 and $500).
  • $750 but less than $2,500 is a Class A misdemeanor (formerly between $500 and $1,500).
  • $2,500 but less than $30,000 is a State Jail Felony (formerly between $1,500 and $20,000).
  • $30,000 but less than $150,000 is a 3rd Degree Felony (formerly $20,000 to $100,000)
  • $150,000 but less than $300,000 is a 2nd Degree Felony (formerly $200,000 to $300,000).
  • $300,000 or greater is a 1st Degree Felony (formerly over $200,000).

You can read about the punishment levels here.

Though all the changes have some impact, the two areas I expect to see the most impact will be adjusting Class C thefts up to $100 because this will have the effect of making many more shoplifting incidents (those between $50 and $100) more easily expungable and taking them out of the County Courts at Law.  Also significant is new difference between felony and Misdemeanor thefts (formerly $1,500 and now $2,500).  This will keep many people under the felony threshold as well.

*Jeremy Rosenthal is Board Certified in Criminal Law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization and licensed by the Supreme Court of Texas. Nothing in this article is intended to be legal advice.  For legal advice for any situation you should contact an attorney directly.


Texas Theft Level Charge Classifications

April 9, 2010

By Collin County Criminal Defense Lawyer Jeremy Rosenthal

texasdefensefirm.com

(972) 369-0577

Criminal charges for theft in Texas depend on the amount or value alleged to have been stolen.  Regardless of how small a theft charge may be, however, the stigma attached with a theft charge is extremely damaging.

Below $50; Class C misdemeanor (Fine not to exceed $500).

Between $50 and $500; Class B misdemeanor (up to 180 days county jail and/or $2,000 fine).  Theft by check is a Class B misdemeanor where the check was above $20 even though the amount would normally qualify for a Class C.

$500 to $1,500;  Class A misdemeanor (up to 1 year county jail and/or $4,000 fine).

$1,500 to $20,000;  State Jail Felony (between 180 days and 2 years State jail and fine up to $10,000).

$20,000 to $100,000; Third Degree Felony (between 2 and 10 years TDC and fine not to exceed $10,000).

$100,000 to $200,000; Second Degree felony (between 2 and 20 years TDC and fine not to exceed $10,000).

$200,000 and above; First Degree felony (between 5 and 99 years TDC and fine up to $10,000).

Theft crimes are also subject to enhancements.  For example, two final theft convictions in any amount can make a third theft conviction in any amount a State Jail Felony.  This means a petty theft of a pack of chewing gum could conceivably be a felony with two prior theft convictions in the past.

Regardless of the amount — there is no such thing as a small theft charge.

*Jeremy Rosenthal is Board Certified in Criminal Law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization and licensed by the Supreme Court of Texas. Nothing in this article is intended to be legal advice.  For specific legal advice you should consult an attorney.


Why a Theft Charge is Bad News

March 17, 2010

By Collin County Criminal Defense Lawyer Jeremy Rosenthal

(972) 369-0577

Theft is regarded in Texas as a “crime of moral turpitude” unlike driving while intoxicated or drug possession.

Crimes of moral turpitude have far-reaching collateral consequences that can almost be incalculable ranging from denial of professional licensing, to federal immigration consequences, to being impeached in future legal proceedings.

Theft is beatable in court. There are also ways of getting the theft charge off your record through probation programs by agreement.

There is no one comprehensive list of crimes of moral turpitude and there is no universally agreed upon definition, but theft has been held to be one and is squarely within what courts have defined to be crimes of moral turpitude in the past.  Milligan v. State, 554 S.W.2d 192 (Tex.Crim.App. 1977).

What this means is that EVERY theft case is a big deal regardless of whether it’s shoplifting a pack of gum or multimillion dollar embezzlement.  When dealing with any type of theft or shoplifting charge, it is always critical to consult an attorney who can attack your legal problem with the long range vision of keeping your future goals in-tact.

Even taking deferred adjudication on theft or shoplifting cases can have collateral consequences that are unforeseen.  For instance the federal government or other states may not necessarily accept your texas deferred adjudication on theft and they could conceivably treat deferred as a conviction.  Also, many civil administrative and occupational Texas statutes may come into play with regards to your job and profession — and those statutes are subject to change years after your case was completed.

Unfortunately, many people who took a quick and easy deal when they were younger to either save money on hiring a lawyer or because they didn’t think it was a big deal — find out years later when they lose an important opportunity. For a theft or shoplifting case, regardless of how small, you should get a lawyer!

*Jeremy Rosenthal is Board Certified in Criminal Law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization and licensed by the Supreme Court of Texas. Nothing in this article is intended to be legal advice.  For legal advice, you should consult an attorney.