When an Interlock Ignition Device is Required for a DWI – and When it Comes Off

January 10, 2021

By DFW Criminal Defense Lawyer Jeremy Rosenthal

(972) 369-0577

www.texasdefensefirm.com

The blow devices to start your car (also known as “deep lung devices,” “DLDs,” or “Interlock Ignition Devices”) have been one of the most major developments in DWI cases over the last 15 years.

The Texas Legislature and courts have been increasingly requiring them in impaired driving cases.  In some circumstances they can be ordered to be placed on your car immediately after an arrest and can remain on the vehicle even after a person finishes probation years later.  The legislature has even incentivized folks to get interlock devices by offering benefits such as non-disclosure eligibility if someone voluntarily keeps one on their car during probation when they otherwise wouldn’t be required to keep one.

Possible Times when a DLD Can Be Ordered By A Judge

 

As you can see, the case has many times where the interlock can be ordered onto the car by the Judge.  Many of these time periods can and do run consecutively and over-lap meaning the interlock may simply stay on from the point a person gets it onto their car until the case is finished.

Ignition interlock providers claim it can only be removed by court order and have this provision in their service contracts… so they typically won’t even remove the device unless or until they see a court order.

What if You Don’t Drive Anymore or Can’t Have the Interlock for Some Other Reason?

Most judges will allow you to substitute a hand-held device for an interlock device though I’ve not found any support in the code for this.  If you have questions or need an alternative or to substitute the interlock device then speak with your lawyer.

*Jeremy Rosenthal is certified in criminal law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization.  He is recognized as a Texas Super Lawyer by Thomson Reuters.

Comments Off on When an Interlock Ignition Device is Required for a DWI – and When it Comes Off | Divorce related crimes, DWI, probation, Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Permalink
Posted by niftybrady

Probation Officer Recommendations

January 5, 2021

By Collin County Criminal Defense Lawyer Jeremy Rosenthal

(972) 369-0577

www.texasdefensefirm.com

Probation officers are often the gatekeepers between their probationers and ultimate freedom.  Probation officers are often asked about recommendations for things like travel, removal of an interlock ignition or deep lung device from a vehicle in DWI cases, or even early release from probation.

When folks visit with me wanting to change something about their probation, it’s very common for them to tell me their probation officer is “not opposed,” or “on board with” or even “recommends” something.

In truth – when I do pick up the phone to ask the probation officer their views I hardly ever get much of anything useful.  I’m usually told the probation department opposes our request to the judge or takes no position on our request to the judge (usually citing department policy).  I can’t remember the last time a probation officer actually told me they supported our motion.

Probation officers also make recommendations for revocations and adjudications.  It’s a bit of a different topic – but remember it is the Judge who ultimately determines what happens in a case, not the probation department.

Probation Officers Don’t Like Making Recommendations

Probation officers work in a bureaucracy. I’ve been in the Army, the District Attorney’s Office, and and have worked alongside government my entire career.  My blog is anything but political but probation departments with their bureaucracies come with some flawed cultures I’ve noticed.

I find there are three cultural problems I’ve seen with probation departments struggle with.  First, there is a climate of fear surrounding decision making.  Personnel are collectively intimidated about sticking their neck-out and making an uncommon or unconventional decision which has any potential at all to backfire.

Second, there is a “default to no” culture at most probation departments.  This means the default answer requests is typically “no.”  The answer is “no” if they don’t understand the request, “no” if they are 50/50 on the request, and especially the answer is “no” if they find a teeny-tiny reason the request could somehow backfire.

Third, if one decision maker is good – then seven are better.  And then they’ll come up with better reasons for saying “no.”

I’m probably jaded, but my view is probation officers simply don’t want to make decisions or recommendations which help their probationers.  They might claim to be in support in closed quarters with no one listening but they often quickly back off any such boldness.  They often claim they are bound not to make recommendations by office policy.  That could be true in some instances but those policies have never limited them from making recommendations against my clients… so I tend to view the policies skeptically.

Often I find a probation officer will claim they are not taking a position – yet they passive/aggressively oppose our requests in open court.  So I never take for granted they are in our corner or neutral on an issue.

I know I’m making many generalizations here.  There are plenty of probation officers I’ve worked with who break this mold and are very forthcoming on their views whether they are helpful or not to my client.

A Probation Officer’s Recommendation Isn’t Everything

It’s okay probation officers if don’t want to make recommendations.  Judges are comfortable making difficult calls granting things the probation department doesn’t like or want.

It’s the Judge who controls terms and conditions of probation – and Judges disagree with probation officers all the time.  Many judges have far more antagonistic relationships with the probation department than you may think.

For these reasons when I’m asked to help someone modify their probation – I just don’t put much stock in what the probation officer reportedly recommends.  If they are in our corner all the better.  But we can still win without it.

*Jeremy Rosenthal is certified in criminal law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization.  He is recognized as a Texas Super Lawyer by Thomson Reuters.

 

Comments Off on Probation Officer Recommendations | Assault, Cannabis, Computer Crimes, crimes against children, Domestic Violence, Drugs, marijuana, Police and Prosecutors, pre trial diversion, probation, Probation Revocation | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , | Permalink
Posted by niftybrady

What is Mitigation?

November 8, 2020

By Criminal Defense Lawyer Jeremy Rosenthal

(972) 369-0577

www.texasdefensefirm.com

“Mitigation” means making something less severe, serious, or painful.  In criminal law it refers to learning, seeking and providing facts which reduce someone’s potential punishment.

Mitigation is Important in Every Single Case

A big misunderstanding is mitigation and trying to get an acquittal are mutually exclusive – they are not.  People think you somehow admit guilt if you try to take mitigation steps after an arrest such as seeing a mental health professional or entering drug and alcohol treatment.

You can still fight for innocence at the same time you try to explain or lessen the harshness of the possible punishment coming towards defendant.  In fact, we are legally bound to do so and it can constitute ineffective assistance of counsel to ignore mitigation.

A solid mitigation case actually strengthens our ability to fight for an acquittal.  This is because we are less concerned about severe punishment in the event a jury disagrees with us and finds the defendant guilty despite our best efforts.

Mitigation Which Looks Backwards

Mitigation can help explain why the Defendant is in the predicament they are in.  Examples of backward looking mitigation to explain or give context to someone’s actions often include:

  • Mental health or psychological disorders
    • anxiety
    • ADHD
    • Depression
    • Bi-Polar Disorder
    • Psychosis
    • Manic episodes
  • Past sexual abuse of the accused;
  • Past physical abuse of the accused;
  • Past or childhood emotional abuse of the accused;
  • Addiction and history of addiction of the accused.

When Someone Has a Great History

Another form of backwards mitigation is potentially where an accused has never been in trouble at all.  Certainly someone who has been straight as an arrow their entire lives do deserve some credit and lenience in many cases.  The same goes for people who really have their act together and are – for example – in school making straight A’s and helping build houses for homeless people on the weekends.

Mitigation which Looks Forward

Any mitigation must have a forward path to be effective.  Explaining to the judge or jury an accused has been able to explain or identify why they have a particular problem is great.  It lets the jury know the accused isn’t an evil person.  But without a path forward to correct things – a judge or jury might feel they need to incarcerate the person to protect society in the future.

Forward mitigation could include steps taken by the accused after the arrest.  Examples are endless of the types of steps which can be taken to hopefully re-assure folks criminal behavior won’t repeat itself with the accused.  Examples might be;

  • Drug and alcohol treatment
  • psychological treatment
  • Sex offender therapy or treatment
  • Rage or anger management treatment.

Examples of Mitigation in Criminal Cases

  • A classic and easy to understand example are Driving While Intoxicated cases.  I explain to clients everyone at the courthouse including prosecutors, judges and probation officers think (1) someone arrested for DWI is not only guilty – but they’ve probably gotten away with it 100 times we don’t know about; and (2) all people arrested for drunk driving are alcoholics.  Those assumptions may be completely fair or unfair – but those are the attitudes we will have to over-come in a case whether we like it or not.

If we can convince the courthouse types not only did the defendant get screwed by being arrested in the first place – but also he’s perfectly fine to drive – it only strengthen’s our overall hand.

Bottom Line on Both Forward and Backward Mitigation

A criminal defense lawyer cannot assume they are just going to win every case no matter how confident we are we will ultimately win.  The Courts have held repeatedly to ignore mitigation is ineffective assistance of counsel.  Mitigation also helps us strengthen our hand and ability to fight the case on multiple fronts – not just sympathy or correcting certain behavior.

*Jeremy Rosenthal is board certified in criminal law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization.  He is recognized as a Texas Super Lawyer by Thomson Reuters.

Comments Off on What is Mitigation? | Assault, Cannabis, Deadly Conduct, Domestic Violence, Drugs, DWI, Homicide, marijuana, mental illness, pre trial diversion, probation, Self Defense, sex cases, sex crimes, Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , | Permalink
Posted by niftybrady

What is the Difference Between a Felony and a Misdemeanor?

October 23, 2020

By Criminal Defense Attorney Jeremy Rosenthal

www.texasdefensefirm.com

(972) 369-0577

A misdemeanor is any criminal charge which carries a potential jail sentence of a year or less, and a felony is anything which has a potential jail sentence over a year.

What dictates is the punishment range – not the actual punishment itself.

Here’s an example:

  • In Texas we have a classification known as a “State Jail Felony.”  Many street drugs such as cocaine in trace or user amounts fit in this category.
  • State jail felonies carry a possible punishment between 6 months and 2 years confinement.
  • Let’s say a person is sentenced to 6 months of state jail
  • The case is a felony because the punishment range or potential punishment from the outset is over a year.
  • Even if the 6 months is probated and the person never goes to jail – the case is still a felony.

What Does it Mean if a Case is a Felony?

Felonies usually carry with them collateral consequences in addition to the potential increased jail.  States can typically restrict voting and professional licenses to felons as an example.  Many employers ask questions to candidates about felonies.  In Texas, some rights are restored to felons after they are no longer under the Court’s thumb.

The Federal Government’s View

Each state may define a felony or misdemeanor however they’d like – but the federal government in making policy on things like immigration, lending, and firearms makes it clear this is how they define the difference.  The US Constitution also has “the Supremacy Clause” which dictates federal law is superior to state law.

For this reason – the federal government labeling someone a felon can be more severe than the state doing so.  As an example, a felon in Texas is permitted to carry a firearm five years after their sentence is complete.  But because the federal government also regulates firearms and they strictly prohibit felons from owning pistols or handguns ever – the Texas law allowing a felon to possess such a weapon is somewhat meaningless.  You’re still breaking the law.

*Jeremy Rosenthal is board certified in criminal law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization.  He has been designated as a Texas Super Lawyer by Thomson Reuters.

 

 

Comments Off on What is the Difference Between a Felony and a Misdemeanor? | Civil Liberties, Collateral Consequences of a Criminal Record, Drugs, probation | Tagged: , , | Permalink
Posted by niftybrady

Will My Probation Get Revoked?

October 20, 2020

By Criminal Defense Lawyer Jeremy Rosenthal

www.texasdefensefirm.com

(972) 369-0577

Legally you could be revoked for showing up late to probation – but that’s obviously an extreme and unlikely scenario.  There are countless variables which go into whether or not your probations revoked – so each case is truly unique.

Those variables can be things like the nature of the underlying offense?  How severe is the new infraction?  Have there been other infractions?  Is the probation officer understanding about your situation?  Are they lazy?  Are they a jerk?  Passive?  Controlling?  What does your county typically do with similar cases and infractions?  The list goes on and on and on.

I get plenty of calls asking me this exact question… will I be revoked?  I understand the anxiety and uncertainty of the position the probationer is in and I really do my best to try and handicap each situation.  But each situation is very different.  Here are some general guideposts, though:

Is the Probation Violation a New Offense or Crime?

If you’ve been arrested again for a new charge your probation officer probably doesn’t have much say in whether or not a motion to revoke or motion to adjudicate is filed.  Those are likely to be dictated by office policy and your PO’s hands are usually tied.

If you do get arrested for something new – and you don’t get revoked – count yourself lucky.

Every probation plan or order I’ve ever seen requires a person to notify their officer upon a new arrest.  So it’s normally a separate probation violation not to disclose it.

“Technical” Violations of Probation

We typically refer to issues such as failure to do community service or take classes as “technical” violations.  Whether your probation is revoked based on a “technical” violation is up to your probation officer.  Failure to pay fines and money fits into a bit of a different legal category – so I’m not including that here.

It really is impossible to quantify what each individual probation officer would do in any county in Texas in any given scenario.  If you’re on probation for drugs or DWI and you’ve done 90 out of 100 hours of community service – I like your odds of not being revoked more than if you’re on probation for a violent crime and have done 0 out of 100 hours of community service.

I also like your odds of not being revoked on a “technical” violation more if you’ve never been in trouble with your PO before than if your PO has already given you 5 warnings about the same thing.

Positive Drug Tests

This is a very common trigger for a revocation or adjudication.  My experience is it takes more than one – but this is an area where each county is different.  The main reason a single positive UA probably won’t get you revoked is your PO has a lot of options at their disposal to remedy or punish short of full-blown revocation.  It could include a jail sanction, additional classes, or even them asking you to extend your probation.

But Here’s What Experience Teaches Me — At Least in Collin County

It never hurts to be on your probation officer’s “nice” list and not “naughty” list.

Being a probation officer is a very tough job as much as I might criticize them.  Most are over-worked and under paid.  They are like you and I.  I’m guessing it’s easy for them to deal with most people on their case load — and then they have some they deal with regularly who aren’t very pleasant to work with at all.

I don’t think many probation officers show up to work looking to screw people.  The fact is they have enough headaches on their case load without inventing more.

*Jeremy Rosenthal is Board Certified in Criminal Law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization.  He is a Texas Super Lawyer as designated by Thomson Reuters.

 

Comments Off on Will My Probation Get Revoked? | Assault, Civil Liberties, Collateral Consequences of a Criminal Record, Drugs, mental illness, pre trial diversion, probation, Probation Revocation, Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , , , , | Permalink
Posted by niftybrady

« Previous Entries