Dallas Police Want to Do Blood Warrants for All DWI Arrests

March 16, 2010

The Dallas Morning News published an article yesterday stating that the Dallas Police Department would like to take a blood sample with every DWI arrest.  To accomplish this, they would need to take every case before a magistrate to determine whether there is probable cause to issue a search warrant and allow the police to draw the blood.

You can read the article here.

There are many concerns about this approach above and beyond what the City thinks the drawbacks to be (i.e. money).  The bottom line is that they presume everyone arrested is guilty.  You can only rationalize their thought process by skipping whole-heartedly over the presumption of innocence:

(1) It’s okay to cause bodily injury as defined in the Texas Penal Code by sticking a needle in someone’s arm to solve a misdemeanor offense;

(2) Stating that it will equal more guilty pleas and more convictions (again, only true if everyone you arrest is guilty); and

(3) turning our independent judiciary into de facto law enforcement by having them rubber-stamp every arrest for a search warrant.

Dallas police may be very careful about what they wish for.  Based on the article, it sounds like whether someone is taken for a blood test is a somewhat arbitrary decision by the officer right now.  Are the officers only taking the people they are positive will fail a blood test?  It wouldn’t be surprising to see a blanket policy result in far more tests results below or near 0.08 which could mean more trials.  And to speak DPD’s language, more taxpayer waste.

Jeremy F. Rosenthal, Esq.

(972) 562-7549

*Jeremy Rosenthal is Board Certified in Criminal Law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization and licensed by the Supreme Court of Texas. Nothing in this article is intended to be legal advice.  For legal advice, you should consult an attorney.

Leave a Comment » | Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Permalink
Posted by Jeremy Rosenthal, Esq.

Punishment for a 2nd DWI in Texas

February 22, 2010

By Collin County Criminal Lawyer Jeremy Rosenthal

texasdefensefirm.com

(972) 369-0577

Convictions for DWI’s are like stacking bricks higher and higher.  To recap, a first DWI is a Class B misdemeanor in Texas.  A second DWI is a Class A Misdemeanor.  The punishment range is between 72 hours of jail and 365 days, an/or a fine between $0 and $4,000.

A 2nd DWI means that you’ve been convicted of the first — regardless of how long ago that may have been.

Like a 1st DWI, probation is often the result of a conviction for a 2nd DWI — but clearly there is more jeopardy involved in a 2nd offense.  The maximum probation is 2 years and the probation itself gets stickier.  For example, in Texas we have what is called jail as “a term and condition” of probation.  What this means is that the Judge can send you to jail for up to 30 days as a part of your probation.  The minimum community service for a 2nd DWI is 80 hours.

Additionally, the Judge is required to place an interlock device on your car when you are originally released on bond from jail in the case while you await trial.  You can expect it to stay on during probation with a conviction.

As for driver’s license suspensions — the term of the suspension increases to 2 years (from the max of 180 days).  A person can qualify for an occupational license to assist them in driving to work, however, if the 2nd DWI was within 5 years of previous law enforcement contact involving alcohol, then the person doesn’t qualify for the occupational for 180 days after the suspension begins.  This is what DWI lawyers in Dallas and Collin Counties call a “hard suspension.”  It means no driving for six months.

Also the surcharge is $1,500 per year for 3 years.  Again, the surcharge is $2,000 for a breath test score over 0.16 for 3 years.

In Texas, some County Courts at Law have DWI programs for 2nd time DWI convictions.  In Collin County they have courts with intensive treatment but that offer some incentives to join the program such as lesser fines.

*Jeremy Rosenthal is Board Certified in Criminal Law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization and licensed by the Supreme Court of Texas. This article is not intended to be legal advice.  For legal advice you should consult an attorney.

4 Comments | Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Permalink
Posted by Jeremy Rosenthal, Esq.

Your Driver’s License Isn’t Actually Automatically Suspended If You Refuse A Breath Test

February 20, 2010

By Collin County Criminal Defense Lawyer Jeremy Rosenthal

(972) 369-0577

Texas DWI’s have two sides.  There is a criminal side and the administrative side (i.e., the driver’s license suspension.)  Today I’m only discussing the administrative driver’s license suspension side.

Texas has an “implied consent” law.  This means when you got your driver’s license, you implied to the Department of Public Safety (“DPS”) that if an officer ever offered you a breath-test, you would comply.  If you fail to comply – or you do comply and blow over 0.08 – then your driver’s license can be suspended.

What the DPS media blitz omits is that this isn’t automatic.  You have 15 days from the date of arrest to submit an appeal.  The instructions are on the sheet of paper they should have given you when they confiscated your driver’s license.

You are appealing the officer’s decision to ask you to take the breath test and/or the breath test score.  These things can be very legally technical and it is frankly difficult for people to win without lawyers.  These proceedings are generally called ALR’s by lawyers which is short for Administrative Law Review.

ALR’s are done in Collin and Dallas Counties like a deposition in a conference room and most lawyers advise their clients not to attend.  If the ALR Judge determines DPS lost your ALR, then your driver’s license is not suspended.  This happens all the time.

The ALR proceedings run concurrently or parallel to your criminal DWI case.  Sometimes the ALR proceedings take longer and sometimes they’re shorter.  If you win your DWI on the criminal side, the driver’s license suspension can also be negated.

*Jeremy Rosenthal is Board Certified in Criminal Law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization and licensed by the Supreme Court of Texas. Nothing in this article is intended to be legal advice.  For legal advice consult an attorney.

1 Comment | DWI, Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Permalink
Posted by Jeremy Rosenthal, Esq.

Why You Shouldn’t Represent Yourself in a DWI

February 9, 2010

By Collin County Criminal Defense Lawyer Jeremy Rosenthal

jeremy@texasdefensefirm.com

(972) 369-0577

Here’s why:

DWI Laws Are Nastier Than You Think

The laws against DWI are getting nastier and nastier with no end in sight.  My clients hear me repeat the phrase, “no politician ever got elected in Texas promising to go easy on DUI cases.”

Many people arrested for DWI feel they were wrong and should take responsibility for their mistake.  While this is an extremely admirable trait — it assumes the price for taking responsibility isn’t cruel and thoughtless.

The one thing the legislature can’t take away from you is your constitutional right to an advocate.  It’s the only way to try and level the playing field.

Don’t Assume Your Arrest is a Lost Cause

First, as any prosecutor will tell you, DWI’s can and do very frequently end in acquittals.  Jurors are just like you.  In a DWI they truly presume you innocent unlike other cases.  They listen much to the dismay and chagrin of the prosecutor and the police officer who would have them believe there is only one side to the story.

Scientific Testing are Man-made Mouse-traps

Blood and breath tests can be discredited through different scientific arguments and sometimes you can demonstrate to the jury the test was simply improperly conducted.  The equipment is fallible and jurors are often surprised at just how imprecise these machines truly are.

The practice of blood warrants is controversial.  Forcibly putting a needle in someone’s arm would be a 2nd Degree Felony under the Texas Penal Code (aggravated assault with a deadly weapon) if it weren’t conducted under the color of law.  Regardless, DWI enforcement has lost so much perspective that this practice is justified to solve first-time DWI offenses that are Class B Misdemeanors.

Police Have to Follow the Rules Too

Additionally, Judges frequently suppress improper traffic stops or other improper police contact.  This means that where an officer has been overly-aggressive in finding a reason to pull a car over or the officer didn’t have the right to visit with you… all or some of the evidence may be thrown out by the Judge if improperly attained pursuant to Texas Code of Criminal Procedure 38.23.  In those instances field sobriety tests, breath tests, and even blood tests can be inadmissible for the prosecution.

There is so much at stake in a DWI for your future that a short article hardly does it justice.  I’ve only addressed the tip of the iceberg as far as consequences and punishment.  There is so much other red-tape such as driver’s licenses suspensions, surcharges for driver’s license renewals, and deep-lung-devices being ordered on your car, it hardly makes sense to go into this process alone.

*Jeremy Rosenthal is Board Certified in Criminal Law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization and licensed by the Supreme Court of Texas.  He is designated as a Texas Super Lawyer by Thomson Reuters.  www.texasdefensefirm.com.

1 Comment | DWI, Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Permalink
Posted by Jeremy Rosenthal, Esq.