Passing The Breath Test Doesn’t Mean You Don’t Get Charged with DWI

March 5, 2010

By Collin County Criminal Defense Lawyer Jeremy Rosenthal

(972) 369-0577

texasdefensefirm.com

Texas Penal Code Section 49.01(2) defines intoxication as

“(A) not having the normal use of mental or physical faculties by reason of the introduction of alcohol, a controlled substance, a drug, a dangerous drug, a combination of two or more of those substances, or any other substance into the body; or

(B)  having an alcohol concentration of 0.08 or more.”

As you can see the legislature used the word “or” between subsection (A) and (B).  This means that you can be charged with DWI where the officer believes you “do not have the normal use…” regardless of whether a breath test was taken — and regardless of whether a breath test result was below 0.08.

Technical Supervisors, who are the state’s “breath test experts” at trial have training on alcohol, it’s effects on the body, and it’s effects on driving.  They testify, in general, that no one has the “normal use” above 0.08 for the purposes of operating a motor vehicle and some lack the “normal use” below 0.08.

The end analysis is simple — if the officer says you’ve lost the “normal use,” then you are getting arrested for DWI regardless if you blow a 0.11 or a 0.06.

Many police officers will also suspect marijuana, narcotics, or medications may be responsible for someone’s condition even if there is little or no evidence of it.

As a former Collin County Prosecutor and as a Criminal Defense Lawyer in Dallas and Collin Counties, I have yet to see or hear of anyone that got taken back to the police station for DWI, was asked to take a breath test, and wasn’t charged with DWI regardless of the result.  Maybe it has happened.  I’ve just never heard about it.

This is part of the lose-lose equation which is the breath test.  And then the police actually wonder why people refuse the breath test all the time.

*Jeremy Rosenthal is Board Certified in Criminal Law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization and licensed by the Supreme Court of Texas. Nothing in this article should be considered legal advice.  For legal advice, you should consult with an attorney.

1 Comment | DWI | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Permalink
Posted by Jeremy Rosenthal, Esq.

You Don’t Have to Prove You Are Innocent — It’s Probably Impossible Anyway!

March 4, 2010

By Collin County Criminal Defense Lawyer Jeremy Rosenthal

(972) 369-0577

texasdefensefirm.com

One of the most common misconceptions in criminal law is people’s confusion about the difference between proving innocence and casting doubt.  It’s an understandable mistake because after all — we’re all programmed since birth to hear ‘both sides of the story.’

In our system of justice — you are under absolutely no burden whatsoever to prove you are innocent.  The prosecution must prove you’re guilty beyond all reasonable doubt.  If they can’t, then you’re entitled to acquittal.

This is because another way of saying a person has a reasonable doubt is there is a reasonable chance the person is innocent too.  So you can see the huge difference in demonstrating how innocence is a reasonable possibility and actually convincing jurors a person is innocent.

When I had jury duty in Collin County they even showed us a video where an actor said, “we had to find the person innocent” which, to me, sounds like someone scratching a chalkboard… they really had to find the person was ‘not guilty.’  and there is a huge difference.

There is really no other fair way to have a criminal trial if you really think about it.

During jury selection, I’ll often ask a panel member how they would prove to me that they didn’t break a traffic law — say speeding or running a red light — on their way to court.  Most say that they could swear to it.  But then they draw a blank about how they would actually prove their innocence with hard evidence and not just their word.  The truth is that they could never prove their innocence unless there was some sort of camera following them on their entire trip which is silly to even think about.  In fact, the harder they tried to somehow unsuccessfully prove their innocence — the guiltier they would look!

Think about all the people being let go after years and years of prison due to exoneration.  Those are cases where there is DNA evidence — and DNA evidence is not commonly used in DWI cases, theft cases, or drug possession cases.  It’s not always even available in murder or sexual assault cases!

If you’ve been charged in Dallas or Collin County you shouldn’t worry about whether you can prove that you’re innocent.  I’ll save you the time and trouble — there is a great possibility that you can’t – and you don’t have to anyway.  Focus on getting a criminal defense lawyer that can use the evidence available to cast doubt on the prosecution and state’s conclusions.

*Jeremy Rosenthal is Board Certified in Criminal Law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization and licensed by the Supreme Court of Texas. Nothing in this article should be considered legal advice.  For legal advice you should consult directly with an attorney.

1 Comment | Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , | Permalink
Posted by Jeremy Rosenthal, Esq.

If I Am Guilty, Then I Have to Plead Guilty, Right?

March 2, 2010

By Collin County Criminal Defense Lawyer Jeremy Rosenthal

texasdefensefirm.com

(972) 369-0577

Wrong, wrong, wrong!

People say this to me all the time.  I honestly admire them when they do.  But here’s the thing — you have a right straight from our Constitution to plead not guilty and force the state to prove your guilty beyond all reasonable doubt.  If they can’t you are entitled to acquittal regardless of what you did or didn’t do.  People who have a problem with that also have a problem with Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, and our other founding fathers.

Here is the flaw in the “I have to plead guilty” attitude:  Just because you’re being remorseful doesn’t mean the law and the prosecutor will be fair.  The State of Texas doesn’t have a phone line to the almighty so they can together decide what is and is not justice (regardless of the attitude of many of their prosecutors and policemen).

Take a DWI arrest in Collin County for example.  The person is taken to jail which is like a punch in their gut.  They have an embarrassing scene on the roadside, and then they have friends or loved ones help them get out which is also humbling.  For many, that experience alone may be punishment enough.

The state takes the position that you need to be branded with this forever and they’ve put a price tag on it designed to be as nasty a hardship on your wallet as they can possibly inflict.  Not only that, some politician down in the polls 15 or 20 years from now may decide to re-punish you with additional red-tape to prove they are “tough on DWI”  (and yes, there have been laws passed this last decade which affect the rights of those convicted in the past).

Also don’t forget you don’t have to prove your innocence at trial.  Even if you are guilty, the state often can’t prove it or they make a legal mistake entitling you to acquittal.  That is their fault and not yours.  Again, you’ve done nothing shameful or dishonest by pleading not guilty.

Merely because a prosecutor or policeman says pleading guilty equals justice doesn’t make it so.

*Jeremy Rosenthal is Board Certified in Criminal Law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization and licensed by the Supreme Court of Texas. Nothing in this article is intended to be legal advice.  For legal advice please directly consult an attorney.

2 Comments | Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Permalink
Posted by Jeremy Rosenthal, Esq.

Am I Guilty Just Because I was There?

March 1, 2010

By Collin County Criminal Lawyer Jeremy Rosenthal

texasdefensefirm.com

(972) 369-0577

In Texas, mere presence at a crime scene alone is insufficient to sustain a conviction.  The difference between just being at a crime scene and doing something which can be considered aiding or abetting is paper thin, however.  And if you’re complicit in an offense — you can be held equally responsible.

Texas has what is called the law of parties in criminal cases.  It is governed by Section 7.02 of the Texas Penal Code.

Tex.Pen.C. 7.02(2) says that if a person, “solicits, encourages, directs, aids, or attempts to aid the other person to commit the offense…” then they are criminally liable as well.  I’ve italicized the words above to show just how liberal the application of that law can be.

Let me give you a hypothetical of how this rule applies.  Take two 18-year old boys at the mall.  One decides he’s going to shoplift and the other doesn’t know about it.  If the friend doesn’t see and doesn’t know that the other was trying to steal as they all walk out of the store — it would be very difficult to say the non-stealing friend is guilty under the law of parties.  Certainly the shop owner and police may think so; but they would have to prove that in court.

On the other hand, let’s say the one guy is trying to shoplift and friend sees it.  He doesn’t participate, but he gets nervous and when the shop owner looks over at him, he “acts natural.”  Are both guilty of theft?  It’s a tough question.  Some jurors may consider that aiding or attempting to aid in the furtherance of the offense.

Issues like these are why criminal defense lawyers experienced in trial are crucial.  A criminal defense lawyer can force the prosecution to prove the complicit beyond all reasonable doubt.  If the prosecution can’t, then there will be an acquittal.  The burden is on the state to prove your intent and your actions.  The burden isn’t on you to show you were innocent!

It should be noted that there are many offenses where people have an affirmative duty to report the crime that they’ve witnessed.  This generally includes felony offenses and other cases where the witness owes a special duty to the victim.  Also anytime a person suspects abuse or neglect of a child, they have a legal duty to report the same to Child Protective Services.

*Jeremy Rosenthal is Board Certified in Criminal Law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization and licensed by the Supreme Court of Texas. Nothing in this article is intended to be legal advice.  For legal advice, please consult an attorney.

2 Comments | Theft | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , | Permalink
Posted by Jeremy Rosenthal, Esq.

Next Entries »