Podcast – Intellectual Property Guest James Gourley

January 1, 2021

By Criminal Defense Lawyer Jeremy Rosenthal

(972) 369-0577

jeremy@texasdefensefirm.com

One of the fun things about my podcast which I’m calling “The Lawyer Show” is getting to visit with lawyers who don’t do what I do.

I learned a ton about intellectual property law with attorney James Gourley.  Enjoy.

*Jeremy Rosenthal is certified in criminal law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization.  He is recognized as a Texas Super Lawyer by Thomson Reuters.

Comments Off on Podcast – Intellectual Property Guest James Gourley | Uncategorized | Tagged: , , | Permalink
Posted by niftybrady

Domestic Violence Charges – Blog 18:  Preparing for Mitigation and Punishment

December 30, 2020

By Criminal Defense Lawyer Jeremy Rosenthal

(972) 369-0577

www.texasdefensefirm.com

We attempt to fight all cases on two fronts.  We are prepared to fight about guilt/ innocence and we always have to prepare to handle things should we lose.

Preparing for punishment in a trial is like buying car insurance.  No one buys it because they’re planning to crash, rather, you buy it because it’s the prudent thing to do and the law requires it.  The law requires defense counsel to prepare for a punishment phase of a trial too though we do our best to avoid being in one.

For all the tough talk about taking cases to trial and winning not guilty verdicts – punishment and mitigation cannot be ignored.

Here are my other blogs in this series on defending domestic violence charges.

Mitigation

Mitigation is evidence which tends to explain or lessen the culpability.

I explain to clients people commit acts of domestic violence for one of two reasons.  Either they are rotten and no good SOBs who enjoy inflicting pain on people they love — or there are deeper causes, factors, and issues which need to be untangled.  In all my years of practice, I don’t know if I’ve met anyone in the first category.  The former is a caricature or cartoon figure which prosecutors make my clients out to be — the latter is reality.

As for the deeper causes or roots to these situations — we can and do find them everywhere.  They can be anger issues,  substance issues, or mental health issues.  Perhaps parents or previous partners unintentionally trained them to solve family problems with physical abuse.  Maybe their relationship has the dysfunction of reciprocal domestic violence which needs addressing.

To avoid harsh sentencing we must also present a compelling mitigation case to a judge or a jury.

This Can’t Happen Again

If we are pleading guilty or the jury finds defendant guilty – this is question about which we must be able to assure the jury.  Beyond assuring it doesn’t happen again there are very real victims in domestic violence who need to be allowed to heal in their own way too.

A good mitigation strategy is good for the society, good for the victim and is fair to the defendant in light of all the circumstances.

“Never Lose Punishment”

I have a saying at our office – “never lose punishment.”

Trials are broken into two phases.  The guilt/ innocence phase and if the judge or jury finds defendant guilty then a punishment phase.

We don’t make the facts and each case which walks in the door walks in with different degrees of difficulty.  I’d love to say we can secure acquittals in the guilt/ innocence phase for all – but that’s a tall order.  But we should be able to tell our client’s story in a compelling fashion for the purposes of mitigation if nothing else.

For punishment – the prosecution often has theories and tag lines.  They try to sell the jury on the caricature or cartoon wicked-guy.  We have a human being with a story.  I don’t think we should ever lose punishment.

*Jeremy Rosenthal is certified in criminal law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization.  He is recognized as a super lawyer by Thomson Reuters.

Comments Off on Domestic Violence Charges – Blog 18:  Preparing for Mitigation and Punishment | Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Permalink
Posted by niftybrady

Domestic Violence Charges – Blog 12:  The Consent Defense (i.e. Mutual Combat)

December 23, 2020

By McKinney Criminal Defense Lawyer Jeremy Rosenthal

jeremy@texasdefensefirm.com

(972) 369-0577

Dallas Cowboys at “The Star” in Frisco put on their pads and helmets on a daily basis, go out onto a football field, and routinely intentionally, knowingly or recklessly cause bodily injury to one another.

We all know that’s not assault because when you put the pads on – you’re agreeing to allow another person to inflict pain.  The contact is welcomed.

This is the law school example of the consent defense to assault and it’s my topic today for my continuing series about defending domestic abuse cases.

Police refer to this as “mutual combat” but legally there is no real term for this in Texas.  The law in Texas calls it consent.

The Legal Definition of “Consent”

Use of force against another person isn’t criminal if the other person “effectively consented” or the person reasonably believed the other has “effectively consented.”  The conduct involved must be limited to bodily injury because a person cannot consent, as a matter of law, to aggravated assault (serious bodily injury).

“Effective consent” is defined in the negative.  We know what it’s not… Consent isn’t effective by reason of youth, mental disease or defect or intoxication.  Consent also isn’t effective if it was induced by force, threat or fraud.

So a person can be acquitted of assault — including domestic violence assault — if the jury is instructed on “consent” and the state fails to show beyond a reasonable doubt (1) the complaining witness did not ‘effectively consent’ to the assault and (2) the assault did not cause or threaten to cause serious bodily injury.

How Could this Possibly Apply in a Family Assault Situation?

An example I’ve given to clients countless times is this:  ever see two people stand toe to toe either in a bar or the high school gym?  What are they communicating to one another?  The answer is  BRING IT ON.  If I physically get in another person’s face, stare them down, and dare them to throw a punch at me — my view is I’ve invited physical contact.

And remember – what legally makes domestic assault is the affirmative finding of family violence done by a judge after either a person has plead guilty or a jury has convicted them of assault.  So all the legal defenses to assault are available to a person regardless of gender or family status.

Also many intimate relationships are reciprocally violent.  That is some couples fight one another on a regular basis and both partners are regularly the aggressor, the victim, or it’s indistinguishable.

Given this backdrop – the bar or schoolyard scenario can happen in a living room too.  It’s dysfunctional to be sure… but some couples engage in mutual combat.

Words enough cannot legally trigger self defense.  But words combined with physical manifestations of agreed contact are enough to trigger consent.

*Jeremy Rosenthal is certified in criminal law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization.  He is recognized as a Super Lawyer by Thomson Reuters.

 

Comments Off on Domestic Violence Charges – Blog 12:  The Consent Defense (i.e. Mutual Combat) | Assault, Collateral Consequences of a Criminal Record, Deadly Conduct, Divorce related crimes, Domestic Violence, Emergency Protective Orders, Self Defense | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Permalink
Posted by niftybrady

Domestic Violence Charges – Blog 8: Emergency Protective Orders (EPOs)

December 19, 2020

By Texas Criminal Defense Lawyer Jeremy Rosenthal

jeremy@texasdefensefirm.com

(972) 369-0577

An unpleasant surprise many men and women get when they are released from jail after an assault/ family violence arrest is an order forbidding them from returning home and/or even talking with their spouse or children.

These orders can cause daunting collateral consequences.  They are financially punishing because it often requires one person stay in a hotel during the duration and they are emotionally taxing because one parent may need support in caring for children and assistance with the household.  Sometimes protective orders have the opposite of their intended effect and inject more stress into a relationship instead of relieving it.

The court order can either be an Emergency Protective Order or it can be a term and condition of bond.  In any event, violating them can and often does land the person back in jail.  Violating a protective order is a criminal offense in itself and is usually harder to win in court than the underlying assault case.

Protective orders and emergency protective orders is an extensive topic in and of itself.  Today in my continuing series of blogs on defending domestic violence cases I’ll be hitting the main highlights.

Emergency Protective Orders

Most emergency orders are sought and applied for by officers in an Ex Parte manner – that is it’s the officer alone asking the judge who is typically also setting bond.  It could be because of department policy or the officer thought the situation merited the couple having a “cooling off” period.  EPOs are mandatory for arrests with charges of serious bodily injury or deadly weapons.

On an administrative note – the EPO does not apply to the person’s attorney who can communicate with a complaint witness.

The governing statute for protective orders is Article 17.292 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure.

It is often the case the complaining witness doesn’t want the EPO either.  In this regard the law can be somewhat patronizing.  The complaining witness’ assent is not mandatory.

One of the most embarrassing and humiliating aspects of an EPO is the Court is required to give notice by law to a school of a child of the couple.

Modifying Protective Orders

The legislature requires a hearing for modification of an EPO under 17.292(j).  All affected parties are required to have notice.  Most hearings are somewhat informal.

My experience on modifying protective orders is unless both the accuser and the accused agree – the magistrate won’t modify the order.  Most magistrates also drag their feet because they want a cooling down period between the couple… so even though a person might apply for a modification in the day or two following the arrest – you usually won’t get a hearing for 2 weeks.

Can Protective Orders become Permanent or be Extended?

Yes.  An Ex Parte Emergency Protective Order can be issued for a maximum of 91 days.

In those instances where a prosecutor or complaining witness want to seek a more extended one – the prosecutor can file suit on behalf of the complaining witness and apply for a permanent or extended protective order.

These proceedings are legally more formal and the consequences can be more dire.  If a court makes a finding of domestic violence it can follow the accused forever.

Conditions of Bond Keeping Defendant Away

I mentioned earlier another legal tool keeping someone a certain minimum distance from the complaining witness or preventing communication can be a term and condition of bond.

That means it’s one of the ground-rules laid out by the judge as a condition of release from jail.  Violating a condition of bond means potential re-arrest.  Domestic violence bond violations are the only misdemeanor charge where a judge can hold a person without bond.

*Jeremy Rosenthal is certified in criminal law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization.  He is designated as a Texas Super Lawyer by Thomson Reuters.

 

 

Comments Off on Domestic Violence Charges – Blog 8: Emergency Protective Orders (EPOs) | Assault, Collateral Consequences of a Criminal Record, crimes against children, Deadly Conduct, Divorce related crimes, Domestic Violence, Emergency Protective Orders, Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , | Permalink
Posted by niftybrady

Domestic Violence Charges – Blog 7: Aggravated Assault with a Deadly Weapon

December 18, 2020

By Criminal Defense Lawyer Jeremy Rosenthal

jeremy@texasdefensefirm.com

(972) 369-0577

Most aggravated assaults with a deadly weapon are where someone threatens a person with something like a knife, gun or some other object.  We see domestic cases frequently where the police arrest a spouse or partner who grabbed something like a scissors or a kitchen knife during a heated argument and was alleged to threaten the other.

Aggravated Assault with a deadly weapon is a charge which leaves a mental impression by its name that doesn’t always match reality.  For that reason, I’ve worked with lots of folks who were stunned to have been charged with it.  It goes without saying aggravated assault with a deadly weapon cases can also be far more serious than simply one spouse being momentarily threatened by an object.

Like choking, it is an assaultive offense which is based on it’s conduct as much or more than the result – which is why I wanted to talk about it separately in my continuing series of blogs about defending domestic violence.  Most assault offenses are strictly result-based.

The Law on Aggravated Assault with a Deadly Weapon

This charge is committed where someone uses or exhibits a “deadly weapon” during the commission of an assault.  A “deadly weapon” under Texas law is any item for which the use or intended use could cause serious bodily injury or death.

Remember, an “assault” can be a situation where there is physical contact – or where there is an imminent threat.  So a situation where a knife, gun, scissors, an ash tray, a picture frame, a vase, or anything else are used to threaten another person – it could be construed as aggravated assault with a deadly weapon.

Another area of confusion on these cases is whether the deadly weapon is used “during the commission” of an assault.  Let’s say someone has a weapon at one point during the incident but the assault occurs at a different point.  For instance, a couple is arguing and one has a weapon in their waistband.  The weapon is never displayed.  Moments later that partner hits the other one with their hand.  Many prosecutors would argue the weapon was used “during the commission” of the assault hence aggravated assault with a deadly weapon.

Aggravated assault with a deadly weapon is a 2nd degree felony and punishable between 2 and 20 years in prison and a fine not to exceed $10,000.

Folks who do plead guilty or are convicted o aggravated assault with a deadly weapon can still be given deferred adjudication or probation.  The charge, however, does limit eligibility and defendants who go to trial must have a jury approve probation – and the accused cannot have been convicted of a felony in this state or any other state.

Good News/ Bad News with Agg. Assault w/ Deadly Weapon

The good news with these types of charges is it can be easy to carve out lesser-included offenses.  That means at trial a jury frequently has the opportunity to acquit someone of the higher offense and potentially convict of a misdemeanor assault instead.

The flip side of the coin — the bad news — is for the same reason aggravated assault with a deadly weapon give the prosecution lots of plea bargaining leverage.  They can take a weak aggravated assault with a deadly weapon case and make into a strong misdemeanor or lower felony charge.

*Jeremy Rosenthal is certified in criminal law by the Texas Board of legal specialization.  He is recognized as a Texas Super Lawyer by Thomson Reuters.

 

Comments Off on Domestic Violence Charges – Blog 7: Aggravated Assault with a Deadly Weapon | Assault, Deadly Conduct, Divorce related crimes, Domestic Violence, Emergency Protective Orders, Self Defense | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , | Permalink
Posted by niftybrady

« Previous Entries