Texas Possession of Marijuana Common Legal Issues

June 22, 2010

Texas Penal Code Section 481.121 makes the possession of marijuana a criminal offense.  Sounds simple, right… if there were drugs where you were and the police found them then you’re guilty, right?  Not exactly.  Remember, not only does the state have to prove beyond all reasonable doubt every element of this charge, but they may also have to prove whatever mechanism the used to attain the marijuana (the search) was lawful.

What is the Legal Definition of Possession?

Texas Penal Code Section 1.07(39) defines “possession” as “actual care custody, control or management.”  Proving this for the prosecution is harder than it may seem.  In other words, it’s not enough to prove that someone was merely in close proximity to the drugs.  The state must prove that the accused somehow ACTUALLY took some action to control the paraphernalia in question.  Take for example where a car with 4 passengers is pulled over.  A passenger in the back seat has marijuana in his pocket — gets nervous — and tosses the marijuana underneath the driver’s seat.  After an eventual search of the car – let’s assume the driver gets charged with marijuana possession.  The prosecution must still prove at trial that the driver exercised actual care, custody, control, or management of the marijuana in question.  If the only evidence is that the drugs were found near the driver, the driver in this scenario may be acquitted of possession of marijuana.

Were the Police Allowed to Search?

That is always a question which must be reviewed in great detail.  Everyone within our country’s borders are free from unreasonable searches and seizures based on the 4th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.  Your remedy from an illegal search or seizure is through what is known as the exclusionary rule.  That rule blocks anything and everything attained illegally by police or the government from coming into evidence at trial.  With no evidence at trial, the prosecution loses because they have the burden of proof.

Though I could write about this all day, there are two main kinds of searches.  With or without a search warrant.  A search can be as simple as a pat-down by and officer or a full scale digging of a car or house.  Most searches are without a warrant and the law actually presumes those searches to be unreasonable.  The state must prove their reason to search fits within an exception by clear and convincing evidence if the defendant challenges the search.  A search warrant is presumed reasonable, but is more difficult and time consuming for the police to attain.  You can still challenge a search warrant if it was done improperly.

The word “illegal” with searches tend to throw people too.  Think of it more like an “illegal procedure” penalty in a football game and not some action that will get the police officer thrown in jail himself for doing it wrong.

Judges can and do frequently throw out illegal searches for drugs, marijuana, and other paraphernalia whether they are from cars, houses, and even illegal searches in schools.

Punishment Ranges — What Level Offense is it in Texas?

The punishment for possession of marijuana depends on the amount alleged to have been possessed though other surrounding circumstances can kick up the punishment range such as possession a school zone or possession with intent to distribute.  Otherwise the punishment ranges are as follows:

A usable quantity but less than 2 ounces is a class b misdemeanor;

More than two ounces but less than four is a class a misdemeanor;

More than four but less than five is a state jail felony;

More than five pound but less than 50 pounds is a third degree felony;

More than 50 pounds but less than 2,000 pounds is a second degree felony;

Over 2,000 pounds is a first degree felony.

Jeremy F. Rosenthal, Esq.

(972) 562-7549

*Jeremy Rosenthal is Board Certified in Criminal Law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization and licensed by the Supreme Court of Texas. Nothing in this article is intended to be legal advice.  For legal advice about any specific situation you should contact an attorney directly.


Don’t Agree to a Warrantless Search

April 5, 2010

By Collin County Criminal Defense Lawyer Jeremy Rosenthal

(972) 369-0577

texasdefensefirm.com

Nothing good can happen from a voluntary search.

At best, nothing bad will happen.  Who would ever make a business decision, take a gamble, or play a game where the best you can do is tie?

If you consent to a warrantless search the best thing which could happen is nothing.  The worst thing which could happen is the officer find something illegal and take you to jail — and to make things worse — it leaves you with little legal defense later.

But I Don’t Have Anything to Hide

It’s not uncommon for police to find things you didn’t know were in your car or things you might have forgotten about.  Drugs tend to play “musical chairs” when 3 or 4 people are in a car a police car is in the process of pulling you over.

I can’t tell you how many times I’ve heard people tell me they didn’t drugs were in the car.  Many people also get stuck with weapons charges because they assumed a certain knife or other weapon was perfectly legal.

Warrantless Searches are Presumed Invalid

Most people don’t know that police can’t just dig through your car or house just because they want to.  Police must play within the rules and can only search without a warrant or consent during a hand-full of situations.  In fact, Texas law actually presumes that a warrant-less search is actually invalid.  Where you agree to allow the officer to search, however, you’ve punted your rights away.

Police won’t tell you this, but you’ve got the right under the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and Article 9, Section 1 of the Texas Constitution to be free from unreasonable search and seizure.  You can refuse many searches.  There are some situations where the police don’t need your consent — such as search warrants.  In those situations, your remedy is to fight the search in court later.

Refusing to allow an officer to search during a traffic stop, for example, is easier said than done.  First of all, the vast majority of the time the officer knows (1) what he or she is after; (2) the law with search and seizure; (3) the magic words they need to get you to say to waive your rights; and (4) most people they encounter on the road are subservient to authority and will have a hard time saying no if pressed.

Many people think that if they refuse the search, the officer may become agitated and retaliate somehow by writing more tickets, calling other police to the scene, or trying to search anyway.  Some, all, or none of these things may happen — but what will absolutely happen is that you will waive your valuable rights which will be painfully obvious during later court proceedings.  If we were to stack all the 4th Amendment cases, the pages would go all the way to the moon. Courts have dealt with virtually any scenario you can think of… and the police really do have tons of limitations you may not know about.

Here’s a video from the ACLU that talks about police encounters.  It’s a bit odd and campy, but is very informational and captures the general tone of some police encounters.  It’s obviously not a “how to get away with breaking the law” video, but is intended (as with this blog) to be generally informative of legal rights.

*Jeremy Rosenthal is Board Certified in Criminal Law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization and licensed by the Supreme Court of Texas. Nothing in this article is intended to be legal advice and is intended to be general information.  For specific legal advice you should consult an attorney.