Collin County Pre-Trial Diversion Update (April 18, 2011)

April 18, 2011

By Dallas and Collin County Criminal Defense Lawyer Jeremy Rosenthal

(972) 562-7549

texasdefensefirm.com

The Collin County Pre-Trial Diversion program (formerly known as deferred prosecution program) is beginning to take shape.  This is the program which allows many people who have never had a run-in with the law a chance to fully clear their record without the risks associated with trial.

Prior to 2011, to be eligible for “deferred prosecution,” someone needed to be between the ages of 17 and 21, be accused of a non-violent offense, never have been in trouble before, and a resident of Collin County to qualify for the program.  The former administration (under District Attorney John R. Roach) would not accept applications but would review incoming cases for those they deemed as qualifying.  Those people would get an unsigned letter on the DA’s letter head directing them to call a particular probation officer.  If you didn’t answer on time or if for some reason you never got a letter — you were out of luck.  Finally, if you did successfully complete the program (and that was a bigger “if” than it should have been), you would have to wait 2 years to apply for an expunction, which the DA’s office could technically oppose if they wanted.

Here’s how it works with the new Greg Willis administration — after the arrest, the filing agency (usually the police department that made the arrest) files their case with the DA’s office.  The DA’s office in turn files misdemeanor cases with the trial court or if the case is a felony with the grand jury.

Once the case has been assigned to a trial court, the defendant’s attorney can request the case be considered for the pre-trial diversion from the prosecutor.  If the trial court prosecutor approves, they send it through several channels within the DA’s Office.  If those get approved as well, the accused is invited to meet with the probation officer to enter the program.

Prosecutors are given general guidelines for the Pre-Trial Diversion.  While the program is still not open to DWI or domestic violence cases, felony offenses are now available for the program.  Prosecutors have been instructed to scrutinize cases where there may be impaired driving that falls short of driving while intoxicated — which may include drug arrests in cars.

The trial-courts have agreed, in principal, to cooperate with the Pre-Trial Diversion program.  There are still likely details with the Courts that must be worked out with how these cases are accounted for or monitored.

Finally, the best benefit of all to the Pre-Trial Diversion program is that for the first time, the DA’s office promises the accused in writing that if they successfully complete the program, they agree to dismiss the case and never refile it.  This bar to prosecution makes expunging the arrest more clear and immediate.

Again, the diversion program is still a work in progress. If there are more updates with the program, you can read about it here.

*Jeremy Rosenthal is Board Certified in Criminal Law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization and licensed by the Supreme Court of Texas. Nothing in this article is intended to be legal advice.  For legal advice about any particular situation, you should contact an attorney directly.


Indecent Exposure

December 30, 2010

By Collin County Criminal Defense Lawyer Jeremy Rosenthal

(972) 369-0577

texasdefensefirm.com

There are very few allegations more humiliating than indecent exposure.

Texas Penal Code 21.08 governs Indecent Exposure and that statute holds, “A person commits an offense if he exposes his anus or any part of his genitals with intent to arouse or gratify the sexual desire of any person, and he is reckless about whether another is present who will be offended or alarmed by his act.”

Though indecent exposure is a relatively minor charge, a class b misdemeanor, it can have stigmatizing long-term effects.  Additionally, multiple indecent exposure convictions can result in sex offender registration under Chapter 62 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure.  As such — any indecent exposure charge is an extremely serious one!

Indecent exposure allegations are highly fact and evidence intensive.  Furthermore these cases are highly subjective.  Fighting these charges requires an aggressive attorney that is an experienced trial lawyer and is extremely thorough with the facts.

*Jeremy Rosenthal is Board Certified in Criminal Law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization and licensed by the Supreme Court of Texas. Nothing in this article is intended to be legal advice.  For legal advice about any specific situation, you should consult an attorney directly.

 


Probation Conditions

November 22, 2010

By Dallas and Collin County Criminal Defense Lawyer Jeremy F. Rosenthal

(972) 562-7549

texasdefensefirm.com

When you’re on probation in Texas, you are given a host of “terms and conditions” of probation (otherwise more formally known as “community supervision.”).  Those terms and conditions comprise the laundry list of everything you’re responsible for doing (or not doing as the case may be.)

Common examples of terms and conditions of probation are community service hours and paying off costs and fines.  Usually the nature of the underlying case is reflected in some of the probation requirements.  For example, in a theft case the prosecutor may recommend an anti-theft class and prohibition from entry into a store where the theft occurred.

For DWI probation, the legislature has made several requirements which must be completed.  Examples are attending a victim impact panel and going to a DWI class.  Recently the legislature has added provisions for drunk driving probation depending on the blood alcohol level of persons arrested.  In cases where the blood or breath test is over a 0.15, a deep lung device must be installed on the vehicle for at least 1/2 of the probation period.

Drug offenders are generally required to give random urinalyses and it is not uncommon for probation on drug and alcohol cases to be fairly intensive.  In some extreme cases (felonies), the Judge can order a person to go to county or state-run in-patient rehabilitation which can take upwards of a year to complete.  Even though the program is essentially prison — it is done as a “pre-requisite” of probation.

It is a safe assumption that a violation of the laws of the State of Texas or any other state can trigger a revocation.

A probation officer does not determine whether you have violated your probation (regardless of what they tell you).  They do have a lot of power, however, in a revocation proceeding.  Usually it is the probation officer that can trigger the violation to be heard by a judge by suggesting the prosecutor file a “motion to revoke” or “motion to adjudicate” in deferred adjudication cases.  The judge determines whether there has been a violation and it is a much lower standard of proof than would normally be at trial.

*Jeremy Rosenthal is Board Certified in Criminal Law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization and licensed by the Supreme Court of Texas. Nothing in this article is intended to be legal advice.  For specific legal advice about any situation you should always contact an attorney directly.


Weak Judges vs. Strong Judges

November 3, 2010

By Collin County Criminal Defense Lawyer Jeremy Rosenthal

texasdefensefirm.com

(972) 369-0577

The trial judge calls many of the crucial balls and strikes at trial including on which jurors are chosen to sit on the panel, what evidence the jury may hear, what arguments the lawyers may make, whether the case even makes it to the jury, and what formal instructions are given to the jury.  While some judges see their role as a referee on the sideline — for better or worse — they play a far more important role.

If the Judge makes mistakes in their rulings — those can be appealed.  Here’s why that’s not as easy as it sounds; (1) appeal can be extremely expensive if you don’t qualify as indigent; (2) the appeals courts rarely over-turn what happens in the trial court and often label the trial judge’s mistakes as “harmless error;” and (3) appeal takes a long time which means if you’re convicted at the trial court you may be serving probation or be sitting in jail waiting for the appeals court to look at the trial judge’s mistake (though you may be able to post an appeal bond).

For better or worse, I categorize Judges into two categories: weak and strong.  Weak judges guess at the law and try to make “safe” rulings which won’t get them appealed.  They often gravitate towards the prosecution because the feel safer ruling in their favor on close issues.

Strong judges know the law and aren’t afraid to disappoint the prosecution or the defense for that matter.  Because strong judges give more predictable rulings, their dockets tend to be more efficient as a whole.

*Jeremy Rosenthal is Board Certified in Criminal Law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization and licensed by the Supreme Court of Texas. Nothing in this article is intended to be legal advice.  For legal advice on any specific case or matter you should directly consult an attorney.


Evidence Of Good Character In Criminal Cases

August 24, 2010

By Dallas and Collin County Criminal Defense Lawyer Jeremy Rosenthal

(972) 562-7549

texasdefensefirm.com

We all want to think that our good deeds and honest lifestyle for years or decades should count for something. Often I’m asked by people that have never been in trouble if the judge or jury will be able to know they’re good people.

There are ways and rules which permit you to interject good character to the judge or jury in trial. During plea negotiation, your lawyer can always try to persuade the prosecutor by pointing to a good record or a record of recovery.

Texas Rule of Evidence 404 controls character evidence for the accused in trial. An accused can put “character into question,” but there are some limitations. First is that all evidence must be relevant under TRE 401. “Relevant evidence” means evidence having any tendency to make the existence of any fact that is of consequence to the determination of the action more probable or less probable than it would be without the evidence. Evidence of volunteer work with the elderly, then, might not be relevant during the guilt/innocence phase at a DWI trial even though it is proof of good character.

Also evidence of character cannot generally be used at trial to prove conformity therewith (though rule 404b has specific exceptions). As an example, most judges probably won’t let you defend theft allegations by showing that you have a good credit score. Character is a legally tricky issue and because it’s really on a case-by-case and fact-by-fact problem, many judges will likely disagree as to what is or is not permissible. Appeals courts give trial courts a lot of discretion with these types of things.

Another issue with injecting character into the trial is that when a criminal defendant does this, it can “open the door” to the prosecution using character evidence of their own to try and dis-prove the accused’s assertion of good character. Obviously in cases where the accused has a past record or similar accusations from before — injecting character into evidence can backfire badly at the guilt/ innocence phase of the trial.

Character is always relevant at the punishment phase of the trial where an accused has been found guilty.

*Jeremy Rosenthal is Board Certified in Criminal Law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization and licensed by the Supreme Court of Texas. Nothing in this article is intended to be legal advice. For legal advice about any specific matter you should consult an attorney directly.