Domestic Violence Charges – Blog 6: Impeding Breath or Circulation (Choking)

December 17, 2020

By Texas Criminal Defense Lawyer Jeremy Rosenthal

(972) 369-0577

jeremy@texasdefensefirm.com

In 2009 the Texas Legislature carved out the specific new criminal offense of choking and made it a 3rd degree felony.  Texas Penal Code 22.01(b)(2)(B) is today’s topic in my continuing series on defending domestic violence charges.

The prohibition against impeding breath or circulation of the airway is legally unique insofar as it is a departure from the charge from being result-oriented and makes it conduct oriented.

Tex.Pen.C. 22.01(b)(2)(B) reads accordingly:

…the offense is committed by intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly impeding the normal breathing or circulation of the blood of the person by applying pressure to the person’s throat or neck or by blocking the person’s nose or mouth.

Choking is Hard to Prove

A challenge prosecutors and police have is choking is a hard offense to prove medically or physically.  Only 16% of cases present with major significant medical injury according to one study.  62% of cases present with no visible injury at all and 22% of cases had only minor injuries such as red marks or scratching.  The experts I’ve heard testify in the field claim it’s due to the soft tissue and muscle in the neck.

Things I See In Choking Cases

When police go to the scene of a domestic situation – they know the law and they know what evidence they need to make an arrest.  They fish for magic words they need to make an arrest…

“Did it cause pain…?”

“Did the contact offend you…?”

“Did it impede your airway…?”

Police know choking is a higher charge and they’re specifically looking for this.  It’s not uncommon, then, for us to see pictures of complaining witness’ necks with little or no evidence of trauma.

Blind Lumpers

Another trend I’ve noticed in DV cases are what I call “blind lumpers.”  I’ve even written an article on it published in Texas Criminal Defense Lawyer’s Voice for the Defense Magazine.

A blind lumper is an expert witness who doesn’t know any specifics of the case (blind), and they lump all person’s charged with domestic violence into one neat and convenient pile (lumpers).

Translation:  a medical professional takes the witness stand and says “I don’t know anything about this case… but just because there’s no evidence of choking doesn’t make him innocent.”

This type of testimony — while true — is mainly calculated to take evidence of innocence (no marks on a neck) and turn it into a tie.  Do you know what the neck of someone who didn’t get choked would look like?  It wouldn’t show any marks either.

Impeding the Airway is a Legally Quirky Charge

A final note about choking cases is this – because it’s not result oriented, courts find it difficult to square it with other assault oriented offenses.

Here’s what I mean – because assault charges are typically result based, if the prosecution can’t prove the higher level assault they can often still prove a lesser one.  For example if the prosecution alleges aggravated assault because of serious bodily injury – but at trial the jury only believes there was bodily injury then the jury could still convict defendant if given the option for what is known as a lesser-included offense.

Because choking is focused on manner in which the assault occurred – the prosecution risks an all-or-nothing allegation at trial.

*Jeremy Rosenthal is certified in criminal law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization.  He is designated as a Texas Super Lawyer by Thomson Reuters.

Comments Off on Domestic Violence Charges – Blog 6: Impeding Breath or Circulation (Choking) | Collateral Consequences of a Criminal Record, Deadly Conduct, Divorce related crimes, Domestic Violence, Emergency Protective Orders, Murder, Police and Prosecutors, Self Defense, Uncategorized, Weapons | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , | Permalink
Posted by niftybrady

Domestic Violence Charges – Blog 5:  Affirmative Findings of Family Violence

December 16, 2020

By Texas Criminal Defense Lawyer Jeremy Rosenthal

(972) 369-0577

www.texasdefensefirm.com

A major component of what makes domestic or family violence severe criminal charges in Texas are affirmative findings of family violence.  An affirmative finding of family violence (AFFV) is a declaration sought by the prosecution and made by a judge which triggers additional collateral consequences above and beyond a regular assault case.

An AFFV can be made by the Court whether the case was a guilty plea, no contest plea, or whether the accused was found guilty.  They can even apply to fine-only misdemeanor class c charges.

For more reading on other aspects of domestic violence charges you can go here.

Consequences of an Affirmative Finding of Family Violence

Enhancement

A second arrest for domestic violence charges can be elevated from a class a misdemeanor (Up to a year of county jail and up to a $4k fine) to a Third Degree Felony (2 – 10 years in the Texas Department of Corrections and up to $10k fine).

The family member doesn’t have to be the same person.  In fact, a common scenario I see is someone who at times decades before had plead guilty to what they thought was a traffic level offense of getting into a fight with a parent, sibling or spouse to pay the fine and move on.  Then upon the subsequent arrest – they are hammered with a felony charge.

Inability to Non-Disclose Criminal Charges

The affirmative finding bars non-disclosure or hiding the case from the public once the case is over.  Not only this, but a popular argument I’ve seen prosecutors make is they believe the Texas Legislature intended to create a specific class of offender with the AFFV who is not eligible for non-disclosure in any cases at all that person may have been arrested for.

Here’s an example:  A person pleads guilty to domestic violence and gets deferred in the year 2010.  In 2020 they are arrested and plead guilty for DWI and otherwise qualify for non-disclosing the DWI to hide that arrest from public view.  The prosecution can argue (with varying degrees of success) the person isn’t eligible to non-disclose the DWI because of the DV plea from 2010.

Firearm Ownership

Both Texas and Federal law can restrict your rights to firearm possession and ownership.  Federal law prohibits those convicted of domestic violence from possession.  Texas – and perhaps other states – restrict rights for possession for special permitting to carry firearms.

Divorce, Custody and Adoption Issues

A person with an affirmative finding of family violence cannot be named a managing conservator of a child or a joint managing conservator of a child.  It goes without saying this can be the most devastating consequence of them all because it could mean losing your children in a divorce proceeding.

The Shattered Glass Effect – Indirect and Collateral Consequences 

I’ll go geek lawyer for a second — criminal charges have what we call “direct” consequences and “collateral consequences.”  An example of a direct consequence of an affirmative finding of family violence would be a subsequent charge can be enhanced.  It’s predictable and fairly certain to happen upon a 2nd arrest.

But what about getting fired from a job 8 years later?  Can the legislature change the law for the worse 15 years from now and will it affect someone?  How others view criminal charges over time is thoroughly unpredictable.  We just know it can be bad.

I call remote collateral consequences the “shattered glass” effect.  We simply can’t predict them.  Affirmative findings have far reaching consequences which we just can’t calculate.

*Jeremy Rosenthal is certified in criminal law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization.  He is designated as a Texas Super Lawyer by Thomson Reuters.

 

 

Comments Off on Domestic Violence Charges – Blog 5:  Affirmative Findings of Family Violence | Assault, Collateral Consequences of a Criminal Record, Deadly Conduct, Divorce related crimes, Domestic Violence, Uncategorized, Weapons | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , | Permalink
Posted by niftybrady

Domestic Violence Charges – Blog 4:  Different Charges and Punishment Levels

December 15, 2020

By Texas criminal defense lawyer Jeremy Rosenthal

(972) 369-0577

www.texasdefensefirm.com

I’m dedicating the next few weeks to blogging about defending domestic and family violence charges.  In those blogs I’m discussing here and there the different charge and punishment levels of different assault cases but it’s not particularly reader friendly.  Taking inventory of the different levels of punishment can be confusing so I thought I’d dedicate a blog to giving folks a straightforward index to the most common assault and domestic violence arrest scenarios.

So here it is.

Assault by offensive or provocative contact:

  • Class c misdemeanor (fine only);
  • Prosecuted in city court or in a Justice of the Peace Court;
  • Can be prosecuted by municipal prosecutor (city court) or district attorney’s office (JP Court);
  • Can still be subject to an affirmative finding of family violence.

Assault by threat:

  • Class c misdemeanor (fine only);
  • Prosecuted in city court or in a Justice of the Peace Court;
  • Can be prosecuted by municipal prosecutor (city court) or district attorney’s office (JP Court);
  • Can still be subject to an affirmative finding of family violence;
    • Occurs where someone threatens another with imminent serious bodily injury or death;
  • Can be subject to an affirmative finding of family violence;

Assault causing Bodily Injury:

  • Class a misdemeanor (up to 1 year of jail, fine not to exceed $4k);
  • 3rd degree felony with prior affirmative finding of family violence (2-10 years TDC & fine not to exceed $10k);
  • Prosecuted by District Attorney’s Office;
  • Jurisdiction in County Court at Law if charged as a misdemeanor;
  • Jurisdiction in District Court if charged as a felony;
  • Occurs where there is assault causing bodily injury;
    • “Bodily injury” is physical pain, impairment of physical condition or illness
  • Subject to affirmative finding of family violence.

Violation of a Protective Order

  • Class a misdemeanor (up to 1 year of jail, fine not to exceed $4k);
  • Prosecuted by District Attorney’s Office;
  • Jurisdiction in County Court at Law;
    • Occurs where a person violates an Emergency Protective Order
  • Penalties can be more severe if more frequent violations/ and or violence occurred during the violation.

Assault by Choking (impeding the airway, normal breathing or blood circulation in the neck);

  • 3rd Degree Felony (2-10 years TDC & fine not to exceed $10k);
  • Prosecuted by District Attorney’s Office;
  • Jurisdiction in District Court;
    • Occurs where a person impedes the normal breathing or circulation of the blood of the person by applying pressure to the person’s throat or neck or by blocking the person’s nose or mouth;
  • Subject to affirmative finding of family violence;

Continuous Violence Against a Family Member;

  • 3rd Degree Felony (2-10 years TDC & fine not to exceed $10k)
  • Prosecuted by District Attorney’s Office;
  • Jurisdiction in District Court;
    • Occurs where a person commits two or more acts of assault causing bodily injury against a family member in a 12-month period;
  • Subject to an affirmative finding of family violence.

Aggravated Assault (Serious Bodily Injury)

  • 2nd Degree Felony (2-20 years TDC & fine not to exceed $10k);
  • Prosecuted by District Attorney’s Office;
  • Jurisdiction in District Court;
    • Occurs where a person causes serious bodily injury injury (SBI)
    • SBI is injury with a substantial risk of death, serious permanent disfigurement, or protracted loss or impairment of bodily member or organ
  • Subject to affirmative finding of family violence;

Aggravated Assault (Use or Exhibit of a Deadly Weapon)

  • 2nd Degree Felony (2-20 years TDC & fine not to exceed $10k);
  • 1st Degree Felony (5-99 years or life & fine not to exceed $10k) if deadly weapon used in conjunction with serious bodily injury of a family member;
  • Prosecuted by District Attorney’s Office;
  • Jurisdiction in District Court;
    • Occurs where a person ‘uses or exhibits’ a deadly weapon in the commission of an assault
    • The assault is often assault by threat when a weapon is used to threaten
  • Subject to affirmative finding of family violence;
  • More legally complicated to qualify for probation or deferred adjudication;
  • Not eligible for parole unless 50% or more of the sentence is fulfilled.

*Jeremy Rosenthal is certified in criminal law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization.  He is designated as a Texas Super Lawyer by Thomson Reuters.

 

Comments Off on Domestic Violence Charges – Blog 4:  Different Charges and Punishment Levels | Assault, Divorce related crimes, Domestic Violence, Self Defense, Weapons | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Permalink
Posted by niftybrady

Illegal Searches are More Common Than You Might Think

December 11, 2020

By Collin County Criminal Defense Lawyer Jeremy Rosenthal

(972) 369-0577

www.texasdefensefirm.com

One of the best weapons in defending many cases is the exclusionary rule.  That rule prevents illegally attained evidence from being used by the prosecution during trial.  The exclusionary rule is the citizens legal protection remedy from illegal police acts.

Isn’t it a Bit Much to Say the Police Acted Illegally?

Think of the word ‘illegal’ in terms of a penalty during a football game such as ‘illegal procedure.’  The word ‘illegal’ has a much lighter connotation when we know it’s just a 5 yard penalty for a player moving the wrong direction before the snap.

Calling a search or particular police action ‘illegal’ is really no different.  As the accused, you’re merely saying there was a foul committed without regard to wether it was intentional or severe.  But the rules are the rules and everyone has to play by them.

Motion to Suppress

A motion to suppress the evidence is a request for the judge to trigger the exclusionary rule and render the illegally attained evidence unusable.  The most common legal grounds are the 4th Amendment to the US Constitution prohibiting illegal search and seizure and Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Article 38.23.

Illegal Searches Can’t be Very Common, Right?

They’re more common than you think.  You have to remember civil rights cases from the 1960’s and 1970’s still have a large imprint on search and seizure law.  The courts are uncomfortable with traffic stops and/or searches based on little more than hunches because those were rightly exposed as profiling.  Though today’s police might also include teenagers or people who have an alternative appearance in addition to racial minorities – there isn’t much of a difference under the law.  Profiling is profiling.

Articulable Facts vs. Subjective Opinion

You also have to remember police in targeting certain groups are often aggressive in their approach.  Police need to be able to articulate the facts which justify traffic stops and continued roadside detentions.  As an example a police officer saying he stopped a car because “he just knew they were up to no good” isn’t going to fly.  It’s a hunch and courts don’t like that.

Closer examples might include thin and subjective reasoning for keeping someone detained at a routine traffic stop – nervousness, the time of day/ night, or even labeling the area of the stop as ‘high crime’ with little or no proof.  Courts have repeatedly said these types of justifications are akin to multiplying zeros when it comes to articulable facts.

Articulable facts, on the other hand, might include “the driver was going 58 in a 45.”  Or the driver smelled like alcohol, said he was on his way to Dallas but was driving the opposite way.

So where an officer can plainly, quickly, and obviously explain the probable cause – the better chance they have of keeping a detention legal.  The more they rely on opinion and conjecture – the more problems they might have explaining it later.

Again, police know they are fighting crime and doing great things by keeping drugs, guns, and drunk drivers off the streets.  They will often push and test the rules for reasons they think are justified.

The end result may be that often they have mis-stepped.

*Jeremy F. Rosenthal is certified in criminal law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization.  He is recognized as a Texas Super Lawyer by Thomson Reuters.

Leave a Comment » | Civil Liberties, Drugs, DWI, federal criminal defense, marijuana, Police, Police and Prosecutors, THC, Uncategorized, Weapons | Tagged: , , , , , , | Permalink
Posted by Jeremy Rosenthal, Esq.

Assault and Family Violence Punishment Levels in Texas

November 14, 2020

By Criminal Defense Lawyer Jeremy Rosenthal

(972) 369-0577

www.texasdefensefirm.com

Assault is a result-based charge meaning the severity of the charge is normally commensurate with the degree of the alleged injury.  Assault can range from offensive contact to murder.

The way to think of a result-based charge is the action can be the same but the result is different.  For instance, if I punch another person and they are injured – then it would normally be a class a misdemeanor.  Were I to throw the same punch and hit the same person and they actually died because of the punch – I might be liable for murder.  Same action on my part – far different prosecution.

I’m not discussing affirmative findings of family violence which can also be attached to these types of charges in domestic assault cases.  Those can materially alter and affect the case.  You can read about affirmative findings of family violence here.

Chapter 22 of the Texas Penal Code controls assault related offenses while Chapter 19 controls murder and homicide.  Murder and homicide are obviously more complex so I’ll discuss that in another article.

Offensive or Provocative Contact

  • Class C misdemeanor
    • Punishment is up to $500 fine only;
    • Prosecuted either in municipal court or the Justice of the Peace.

Assault Causing Bodily Injury

  • Class A misdemeanor
    • “Bodily injury” means physical pain, illness, or any impairment of physical condition – Texas Penal Code 1.07(8);
    • Punishment is up to 1 year of jail and up to $4,000 fine;
    • Prosecuted in a county court at law;
    • A judge or jury can give probation.

Enhanced Family Violence

  • 3rd Degree Felony
    • Occurs when a domestic assault is alleged with a prior affirmative finding of family violence;
    • Punishment level is between 2 and 10 years TDC and fine not to exceed $10,000;
    • Prosecuted in a District Court;
    • A judge or jury can give probation depending on defendant’s criminal history.

Assault by Impeding the Airway or Choking

  • 3rd Degree Felony
    • “Impeding” is impeding the normal breathing or circulation of the blood of the person by applying pressure to the person’s throat or neck or by blocking the person’s nose or mouth;
    • Between 2 and 10 years TDC and fine not to exceed $10,000;
    • Prosecuted by district court;
    • A judge or jury can give probation depending on defendant’s criminal history.

Aggravated Assault

  • 2nd Degree Felony
    • Committed with either “serious bodily injury” or with the “use or exhibit” of a deadly weapon;
    • “Serious bodily injury” means bodily injury that creates a substantial risk of death or that causes death, serious permanent disfigurement, or protracted loss or impairment of the function of any bodily member or organ – Texas Penal Code 1.07(46);
    • Punishment is between 2 and 20 years TDC with fine not to exceed $10,000;
    • Discuss probation eligibility with your lawyer.

*Jeremy Rosenthal is certified in criminal law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization.  He is recognized as a Super Lawyer by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization.

 

Leave a Comment » | Assault, Deadly Conduct, Divorce related crimes, Emergency Protective Orders, Self Defense, Uncategorized, Weapons | Tagged: , , , , , , | Permalink
Posted by Jeremy Rosenthal, Esq.

« Previous Entries