The Top 5 Reasons for Getting an Expunction

March 11, 2010

By Collin County Criminal Defense Lawyer Jeremy Rosenthal

(972) 369-0577

Assuming you are eligible for expunction from an arrest in Texas, here are the top 5 reasons to get one if you can.

#5 — Peace of Mind

When I ask people about prior criminal records, I often get blank stares followed by an explanation that is very unsure of the final outcome.  With an expunction, you get the certainty of knowing your status and how to deal with it in any given situation based on what you know is the law and your rights.

#4 — Future Dealing With Law Enforcement

Prosecutors and police officers look at your life through a straw… meaning they don’t care about how many old ladies you’ve helped cross the street in your life.  If you got arrested 18 years ago and “beat the rap” then they make it their business to nail “career criminals” like you!  Without an expunction, that arrest will be seen by law enforcement.  To many of them that prior arrest is as good as a conviction.

#3 — You Never Know When It Will Come Back and Bite You

People can dig into your personal history for all sorts of reasons.  Though law enforcement’s databases tend to be off limits, they sell your information to public information firms who in-turn sell that information to consumers.  Also your court case is a public record and anyone can view it if they are motivated enough for any reason.

#2 — Future Employment

Employers will run your criminal history.  Even if you’re acquitted or the case dismissed, the arrest is still in all the databases of law enforcement unless and until it is expunged.  Having to make your case all over again to your employer about how the charges were incorrect is a losing battle.  Do you think the other candidates interviewing have to explain warts like that?  Not expunging an arrest can cause people jobs.

#1 — Why Wouldn’t you have an Arrest Expunged?

There aren’t any good reasons not to get an expunction when you’re eligible.  The legislature has put mechanisms in place so if you apply for expunction quickly after acquittal (within 30 days), the expenses are minimized.

 

*Jeremy Rosenthal is Board Certified in Criminal Law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization and licensed by the Supreme Court of Texas. Nothing in this article is intended to be legal advice.  For legal advice please consult an attorney.

1 Comment | Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Permalink
Posted by Jeremy Rosenthal, Esq.

There’s No Such Thing as a Minor Family Assault Charge

March 8, 2010

By Criminal Defense Lawyer Jeremy Rosenthal

jeremy@texasdefensefirm.com

(972) 369-0577

Domestic or family violence charges in Texas range from class c misdemeanors (the same level as a minor traffic offense), to felonies in other circumstances.  The fact that some are charged as class c’s doesn’t diminish their importance and can act as a trap door.

A class c assault occurs where there is unwelcome offensive or provocative contact.  The state does not need to prove the victim suffered any pain or discomfort whatsoever.  They appear deceptively insignificant because they can be charged in smaller municipal courts and before justices of the peace where the rules are less formal and far fewer people have lawyers.

In class c domestic violence cases, the prosecution may try and add a small enhancement paragraph to the charge known as “an affirmative finding of family violence” under Texas Code of Criminal Procedure 42.013 and Texas Family Code 71.004.  If the court enters this finding, even where the defendant gets deferred adjudication, then that finding can be used to enhance a future misdemeanor assaults all the way to a felony.

Most domestic violence cases in Texas are charged as the class a misdemeanor assault — where the state must prove some bodily injury (defined as any pain or discomfort).  These cases can be very difficult for the state to prove.  Often times the state will offer a class c deferred on the morning of trial if they feel badly about their case.  Even in those instances, a person charged must be very careful because the affirmative finding may still be attached even though the charges reduced and getting deferred.

If you are charged with a class c assault where the alleged victim was a family member or someone in a dating relationship, you should strongly consider getting a lawyer regardless of how minor you think the situation to be.

*Jeremy Rosenthal is Board Certified in Criminal Law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization and licensed by the Supreme Court of Texas. He is designated as a Texas Super Lawyer by Thomson Reuters.

1 Comment | Assault, Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Permalink
Posted by Jeremy Rosenthal, Esq.

Am I Guilty Just Because I was There?

March 1, 2010

By Collin County Criminal Lawyer Jeremy Rosenthal

texasdefensefirm.com

(972) 369-0577

In Texas, mere presence at a crime scene alone is insufficient to sustain a conviction.  The difference between just being at a crime scene and doing something which can be considered aiding or abetting is paper thin, however.  And if you’re complicit in an offense — you can be held equally responsible.

Texas has what is called the law of parties in criminal cases.  It is governed by Section 7.02 of the Texas Penal Code.

Tex.Pen.C. 7.02(2) says that if a person, “solicits, encourages, directs, aids, or attempts to aid the other person to commit the offense…” then they are criminally liable as well.  I’ve italicized the words above to show just how liberal the application of that law can be.

Let me give you a hypothetical of how this rule applies.  Take two 18-year old boys at the mall.  One decides he’s going to shoplift and the other doesn’t know about it.  If the friend doesn’t see and doesn’t know that the other was trying to steal as they all walk out of the store — it would be very difficult to say the non-stealing friend is guilty under the law of parties.  Certainly the shop owner and police may think so; but they would have to prove that in court.

On the other hand, let’s say the one guy is trying to shoplift and friend sees it.  He doesn’t participate, but he gets nervous and when the shop owner looks over at him, he “acts natural.”  Are both guilty of theft?  It’s a tough question.  Some jurors may consider that aiding or attempting to aid in the furtherance of the offense.

Issues like these are why criminal defense lawyers experienced in trial are crucial.  A criminal defense lawyer can force the prosecution to prove the complicit beyond all reasonable doubt.  If the prosecution can’t, then there will be an acquittal.  The burden is on the state to prove your intent and your actions.  The burden isn’t on you to show you were innocent!

It should be noted that there are many offenses where people have an affirmative duty to report the crime that they’ve witnessed.  This generally includes felony offenses and other cases where the witness owes a special duty to the victim.  Also anytime a person suspects abuse or neglect of a child, they have a legal duty to report the same to Child Protective Services.

*Jeremy Rosenthal is Board Certified in Criminal Law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization and licensed by the Supreme Court of Texas. Nothing in this article is intended to be legal advice.  For legal advice, please consult an attorney.

2 Comments | Theft | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , | Permalink
Posted by Jeremy Rosenthal, Esq.

Should You Answer Questions After You are Read Miranda Rights?

February 25, 2010

By Collin County Criminal Defense Lawyer Jeremy Rosenthal

texasdefensefirm.com

(972) 369-0577

Criminal defense attorneys will universally tell you no — and with good reason.  Prisons are full of people who wish they hadn’t answered questions.

By reading your Miranda warnings, the police are telling you that they have already decided you’re guilty.

At best, they are telling you that they think their investigation may wind-up with you being arrested so they are “crossing their t’s and dotting their i’s.”

“But I’ve got nothing to hide?!?”

Maybe so.  But there are some bad assumptions you are making with that good faith rationale.

The main problem is that you are trying to convince someone that has already made-up their mind.  That is like trying to convince the vending machine that stole your dollar to give it back.

Also — you don’t know what the police are looking for with their questions and they do.  They may want just one key admission to satisfy a legal element they may already know but can’t otherwise prove.  You may tell them worlds of information they would have never known and now they’ve got a better case against you that they ever dreamed.  They’re happy letting you think you’re winning them over.

Police bank on the fact most of us were raised to respect and cooperate with authority.  But an officer’s job is to investigate crime and build cases against people.  Either they can prove all the elements of a crime or they cannot.  If they’ve got no evidence of certain elements — the only way they can get it is out of your mouth!  There is no advantage to talking with them — and if there is — there is no harm in consulting a lawyer first!

*Jeremy Rosenthal is Board Certified in Criminal Law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization and licensed by the Supreme Court of Texas. This article is not intended to be legal advice.  For legal advice, you should consult an attorney.

1 Comment | Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Permalink
Posted by Jeremy Rosenthal, Esq.

They Didn’t Read My Miranda Warnings — How Does it Affect My Case?

February 24, 2010

By Collin County Criminal Defense Lawyer Jeremy Rosenthal

(972) 369-0577

I’m often told by people that, “they didn’t read me my Miranda warnings.”  Sometimes this is important and sometimes it is not.

What Are Miranda Warnings?

Miranda refers to a 1960’s U.S. Supreme Court case where a conviction was reversed because the police did not advise a Defendant of his rights prior to getting confessions for several offenses.  I’ll spare you the legal treatise on the topic but just understand it’s a highly complicated area of law.

The Significance of Miranda Warnings

Miranda violations can result in excluded statements, admissions or confessions a person may make while in custody.

Your right to remain silent and your right to a lawyer are generally triggered when you are in “custodial interrogation” and you are being questioned by the police or other governmental agency.  Custodial interrogation is too complicated to go over in this brief article but I will say that a typical traffic stop will not qualify as custodial interrogation under the current law in Texas.

Texas has codified Miranda in Article 38.22 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure.  That statute has additional protections above and beyond what Miranda required.  An example of an additional protection is that to be used, an oral confession must be made in the presence of some sort of electronic recording device.

To know how significant a Miranda violation is depends on the facts of the case.  

A hypothetical Miranda violation occurs where someone is handcuffed in the police station under a spotlight with interrogators and admits to a crime.  In that situation, failure to Mirandize someone might result in the confession being tossed-out by a Court.

Obviously real life doesn’t work that way and a Miranda violation may be more subtle or less significant.

Take a DWI for example.  Most of the State’s case will be conduct,  breath, and performance on field sobriety tests.  These things are considered “non-testimonial.”

Even if the police violate Miranda and the person confesses to having consumed alcohol but doesn’t believe they’re drunk — the Miranda violation will have little, if any, impact on the outcome.

Contrast a drug possession case.  In those cases, sometimes the only evidence someone was in possession of contraband such as marijuana are statements or confessions after the drugs are found.  If an officer violates Miranda before a confession is given, the violation may very well change the outcome of the case.

*Jeremy Rosenthal is Board Certified in Criminal Law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization and licensed by the Supreme Court of Texas. Nothing in this article is intended to be legal advice.  For legal advice, you should consult an attorney.

1 Comment | Drugs, Search & Seizure, Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Permalink
Posted by Jeremy Rosenthal, Esq.

« Previous Entries
Next Entries »