Clearing an Arrest From Your Record is Like Digging up a Tree

February 8, 2013

By Collin County Criminal Defense Lawyer Jeremy Rosenthal

texasdefensefirm.com

(972) 369-0577

Clearing your criminal history is the goal in every single case.  Knowing how to get there is the trick.

An Expunction under Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Art. 55 is essentially a Court order for the FBI, Texas Department of Public Safety, and anyone who has possession of information about your case to destroy the information.  Not to save or hide the information.  Destroy it.  As you can see in Art. 55.03(2), a person can even deny the occurrence of the arrest in many circumstances.

But how do we get to be eligible for expunction and when does your right become able to be exercised?  That’s an extremely complicated question which depends on the certain underlying facts and charges in your case and could honestly be the subject of 30 blogs instead of 1.

The Core Basics of Expunction Eligibility

Think of an expunction like digging up a tree.  You have to get the root.  An expunction applies to a “unit of prosecution” which is the actual arrest.  Therefore it is the actual “arrest” being erased and all things stemming from the arrest (such as the actual prosecution.)  The arrest is like the root of the tree.  If you get the root, you’ve gotten it all.

As a rule of thumb, if someone is acquitted at trial for all the charges they face from a single arrest — the arrest will be expungible immediately.  For example, being found not guilty for a DWI where no other charges were filed from the same case will allow you to be eligible for an expunction.

Facing Multiple Charges

Facing multiple charges is like a tree with a root system fractured into different pieces in the ground.  You still have to get them all or you’ve not destroyed the tree.

Where a person faces multiple charges from the same arrest, the person must be eligible for each individual charge to be expungible for the case to ultimately be expunged.  So if the person arrested and acquitted for DWI above also was charged with marijuana possession from the same arrest — they would have to be eligible for expunction on both.

Different Ways to Become Eligible for Expunction

Acquittal isn’t the only theoretical path to expunction though practically speaking many times it is.  Most prosecuting agencies will not reduce or dismiss DWI arrests in Texas.  This means usually the only path to expunction is acquittal.  Dismissals and reductions of other certain charges, however, will allow those arrests to become expunction eligible.  In addition, the Collin and Dallas County District Attorney’s office’s have adopted pre-trial diversion programs for the express purpose of incentivizing probation with ultimate expunction depending on the charge.

Translation:  there’s more than one way to skin this cat.

Final Note:  Expunctions don’t happen on their own.

An expunction is a petition filed with the District Clerk of the County.  It is literally it’s own separate lawsuit.  The most common mistake people make is failing to follow up and get their arrest expunged.  A criminal record doesn’t go away on it’s own.  After you win your case, get it reduced, dismissed or however you become eligible for expunction — do yourself a favor and finish the thing off!

For criminal defense lawyers an expunction is like kicking an extra-point after the touchdown… it’s a really fun thing to file after a hard-fought battle for a client!

*Jeremy Rosenthal is Board Certified in Criminal Law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization and licensed by the Supreme Court of Texas. Nothing in this article is intended to be legal advice.  For legal advice about any situation you should contact a lawyer directly.


Texas Possession of Marijuana Common Legal Issues

June 22, 2010

Texas Penal Code Section 481.121 makes the possession of marijuana a criminal offense.  Sounds simple, right… if there were drugs where you were and the police found them then you’re guilty, right?  Not exactly.  Remember, not only does the state have to prove beyond all reasonable doubt every element of this charge, but they may also have to prove whatever mechanism the used to attain the marijuana (the search) was lawful.

What is the Legal Definition of Possession?

Texas Penal Code Section 1.07(39) defines “possession” as “actual care custody, control or management.”  Proving this for the prosecution is harder than it may seem.  In other words, it’s not enough to prove that someone was merely in close proximity to the drugs.  The state must prove that the accused somehow ACTUALLY took some action to control the paraphernalia in question.  Take for example where a car with 4 passengers is pulled over.  A passenger in the back seat has marijuana in his pocket — gets nervous — and tosses the marijuana underneath the driver’s seat.  After an eventual search of the car – let’s assume the driver gets charged with marijuana possession.  The prosecution must still prove at trial that the driver exercised actual care, custody, control, or management of the marijuana in question.  If the only evidence is that the drugs were found near the driver, the driver in this scenario may be acquitted of possession of marijuana.

Were the Police Allowed to Search?

That is always a question which must be reviewed in great detail.  Everyone within our country’s borders are free from unreasonable searches and seizures based on the 4th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.  Your remedy from an illegal search or seizure is through what is known as the exclusionary rule.  That rule blocks anything and everything attained illegally by police or the government from coming into evidence at trial.  With no evidence at trial, the prosecution loses because they have the burden of proof.

Though I could write about this all day, there are two main kinds of searches.  With or without a search warrant.  A search can be as simple as a pat-down by and officer or a full scale digging of a car or house.  Most searches are without a warrant and the law actually presumes those searches to be unreasonable.  The state must prove their reason to search fits within an exception by clear and convincing evidence if the defendant challenges the search.  A search warrant is presumed reasonable, but is more difficult and time consuming for the police to attain.  You can still challenge a search warrant if it was done improperly.

The word “illegal” with searches tend to throw people too.  Think of it more like an “illegal procedure” penalty in a football game and not some action that will get the police officer thrown in jail himself for doing it wrong.

Judges can and do frequently throw out illegal searches for drugs, marijuana, and other paraphernalia whether they are from cars, houses, and even illegal searches in schools.

Punishment Ranges — What Level Offense is it in Texas?

The punishment for possession of marijuana depends on the amount alleged to have been possessed though other surrounding circumstances can kick up the punishment range such as possession a school zone or possession with intent to distribute.  Otherwise the punishment ranges are as follows:

A usable quantity but less than 2 ounces is a class b misdemeanor;

More than two ounces but less than four is a class a misdemeanor;

More than four but less than five is a state jail felony;

More than five pound but less than 50 pounds is a third degree felony;

More than 50 pounds but less than 2,000 pounds is a second degree felony;

Over 2,000 pounds is a first degree felony.

Jeremy F. Rosenthal, Esq.

(972) 562-7549

*Jeremy Rosenthal is Board Certified in Criminal Law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization and licensed by the Supreme Court of Texas. Nothing in this article is intended to be legal advice.  For legal advice about any specific situation you should contact an attorney directly.


Silly Traffic Law = Excuse for Profiling

June 9, 2010

By Collin County Criminal Defense Lawyer Jeremy Rosenthal

(972) 369-0577

texasdefensefirm.com

Texas probably has thousands and thousands of laws on the books.

There is no such thing as a silly or unimportant traffic law and here’s why:  police profile people and those laws — silly as they may sound — legitimize otherwise bogus traffic stops.  Those stops turn into DWI’s, drug possession charges… and if the citizen isn’t doing anything wrong… the stop turns into general harassment.

To be clear, not all profiling is racial.  Sometimes officers will act on “hunches” about how someone looks, what they drive, or how they act.  Usually, though, there is simply nothing illegal about looking different, driving a particular car, or having a nervous disposition.  The law is clear that these reasons alone aren’t enough for police to detain drivers or passengers on the roads.

In order to stop a car, a police officer needs reasonable suspicion that he has witnessed a traffic offense in his presence.  Any offense will do.  But here’s the catch — no matter how badly the officer want’s to pull someone over, they can’t do so unless they witness an offense or otherwise have probable cause to pull you over (such as a 911 call).  So officers will grasp at any law they can to pull people over that they’ve profiled to investigate for something like marijuana, cocaine, or methamphetamine for example.

The classic law is Texas Transportation Code 502.409(7)(b) which says you can’t have anything on your license plate which covers half or more of the name of the State on the plate… such as a frame your dealer put on the car.  While I’m sure there are plenty of legitimate reasons the legislature passed that provision — I can tell you that I’ve seen police pull cars over on multiple occasions due to this law on DWI arrests and drug arrests.  And oh, yeah… the cars seem to be older and beaten up, (and even the opposite — overly flashy) and maybe have a driver that looks poor or is a minority.  I hate to think how many times people have been pulled over and harassed about drugs or intoxication that weren’t doing anything illegal at all.

Ultimately there is no such thing as a silly traffic law.  The police believe that and you should too!

*Jeremy Rosenthal is Board Certified in Criminal Law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization and licensed by the Supreme Court of Texas. Nothing in this article is intended to be legal advice.  For specific legal advice about your own case or situation, you should directly consult an attorney.


Deferred Prosecution for Minors

May 28, 2010

By Collin County Criminal Defense Lawyer Jeremy Rosenthal

texasdefensefirm.com

(972) 369-0577

In Texas juveniles (under the age of 17) that are alleged to have committed crimes can be considered for what is known as “Deferred Prosecution” under Texas Family Code 53.03.

Deferred prosecution means that the juvenile completes an informal probation with the county and if that probation is successfully completed, then the charges are dismissed and not formally prosecuted.  If the juvenile cannot successfully complete the deferred prosecution, then they can be formally prosecuted.

Deferred prosecution for juveniles is better than deferred adjudication is for adults in adult proceedings.  In the adult world, the accused pleads guilty to the underlying charges but forever waives their ability to contest the original charges. Also, in the adult-system, the accused must gain the consent of the prosecutor to get deferred adjudication — not so in the Juvenile Court.  In Juvenile Court, the juvenile has an absolute right to request deferred prosecution directly from the judge AND the juvenile retains the ability to fight the charges later should they be placed on probation… and probation not work out.

Deferred prosecution for juveniles in Texas is almost always a win-win.  The prosecution gets to make sure the juvenile has some sort of semi-formal probation… the juvenile gets a clean record — and just as importantly the juvenile gets to retain his or her important legal rights to fight the case later if necessary.

*Jeremy Rosenthal is Board Certified in Criminal Law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization and licensed by the Supreme Court of Texas. Nothing in this article should be considered legal advise.  For specific legal advice, you should directly consult an attorney about your specific situation.