How Severe is a 1st DWI?

September 2, 2010

By Dallas and Collin County Criminal Defense Lawyer Jeremy Rosenthal

(972) 562-7549

texasdefensefirm.com

A first DWI is classified in Texas as a Class B Misdemeanor.  The punishment range is between 72 hours in jail and/or a fine not to exceed $2,000.

The main difference between a Driving While Intoxicated charge and any other Class B Misdemeanor (such as possession of a small amount of marijuana), is that there is tons of red tape and other administrative penalties that come along.

First is that if you’ve been arrested for DWI in Texas, you’re probably also facing a driver’s license suspension for either refusing the breath test or taking the breath test and blowing over a 0.08.  The suspension is not automatic (even though law enforcement likes to think otherwise), but it’s still an additional headache nonetheless.  For a 1st DWI arrest, the driver should be eligible for what is known as an occupational license which allows them to drive during the suspension period for work or essential household purposes in the event the license is ultimately suspended.

Next is that if you’re convicted of a DWI, then the Department of Public Safety charges you an annual surcharge for 3 years in order for you to maintain your driver’s license.  A generic surcharge is $1,000 per year while if your breath test is higher than a 0.15 the surcharge goes to $2,000.  For a second offense the surcharge is $1,500.  The surcharge program has been the source of much controversy lately but unfortunately you still have to deal with it if you’re convicted.

There is no deferred adjudication for Driving While Intoxicated cases in Texas.  People accused of selling drugs to kids and worse can get deferred — but not on DWI cases.

More recently, Texas laws require Judges to order “Interlock” or “deep lung devices” on cars if the accused is convicted and had a blood alcohol concentration of greater than 0.16 while that person is on probation.  The devices aren’t free and the reporting requirements that come along with the devices can be fairly time-consuming and cumbersome.

Now the good news — DWI cases are very fightable and statistics show even in Collin County that people charged with DWI have a lower conviction rate at trial than almost any other offense.  Also, first-time DWI cases rarely result in jail for the accused an instead get probation even if convicted.

*Jeremy Rosenthal is Board Certified in Criminal Law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization and licensed by the Supreme Court of Texas. Nothing in this article is intended to be legal advice. For legal advice about any specific case you should consult an attorney directly.


Did I Pass the Field Sobriety Test?

August 1, 2010

By Collin County Criminal Defense Lawyer Jeremy Rosenthal

(972) 369-0577

texasdefensefirm.com

When people are visiting with me about their recent DWI arrest in I’m often asked what constitutes passing or failing the standardized field sobriety tests.

I start by telling them that at least according to the grader– they probably failed — but the officer’s opinion ultimately isn’t what counts. It’s the jury’s opinion that matters and if the tests aren’t done to standard (and they often aren’t), then the jury may give the officer’s tests and opinions very little weight.

The truth is that there are three tests that are typically utilized by police and they are highly subjective in how they are graded. Not only that, but they must be given in the manner prescribed by the officer’s training or the results can be compromised. So when the officer says you failed — I tend not to worry.

In fact, the police officer’s own training manual has very strong language about how critical it is to do the test correctly. The Manual issued by the National Highway Training Safety Association (“NHTSA”) says in uppercase, bold letters:

IT IS NECESSARY TO EMPHASIZE THIS VALIDATION APPLIES
ONLY WHEN:

THE TESTS ARE ADMINISTERED IN THE PRESCRIBED,
STANDARDIZED MANNER;

THE STANDARDIZED CLUES ARE USED TO ASSESS THE
SUSPECT’S PERFORMANCE;

THE STANDARDIZED CRITERIA ARE EMPLOYED TO
INTERPRET THAT PERFORMANCE.

IF ANY ONE OF THE STANDARDIZED FIELD SOBRIETY TEST
ELEMENTS IS CHANGED, THE VALIDITY IS COMPROMISED.

While I won’t go into the details of each test just this moment; the horizontal gaze nystagmus (the eye test), the walk-and-turn (the walking the line test) and the one-leg-stand must each be done in the prescribed and standardized manner. If they’re not done that way then the jury can give the tests far less weight at trial — regardless of how the police office thought you did.

So whether you passed or failed ultimately not be the right question to ask. How the tests are done is critical too.

*Jeremy Rosenthal is Board Certified in Criminal Law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization and licensed by the Supreme Court of Texas. Nothing in this article is intended to be legal advice. For specific legal advice you should consult an attorney directly.