Your Driver’s License Isn’t Actually Automatically Suspended If You Refuse A Breath Test

February 20, 2010

By Collin County Criminal Defense Lawyer Jeremy Rosenthal

(972) 369-0577

Texas DWI’s have two sides.  There is a criminal side and the administrative side (i.e., the driver’s license suspension.)  Today I’m only discussing the administrative driver’s license suspension side.

Texas has an “implied consent” law.  This means when you got your driver’s license, you implied to the Department of Public Safety (“DPS”) that if an officer ever offered you a breath-test, you would comply.  If you fail to comply – or you do comply and blow over 0.08 – then your driver’s license can be suspended.

What the DPS media blitz omits is that this isn’t automatic.  You have 15 days from the date of arrest to submit an appeal.  The instructions are on the sheet of paper they should have given you when they confiscated your driver’s license.

You are appealing the officer’s decision to ask you to take the breath test and/or the breath test score.  These things can be very legally technical and it is frankly difficult for people to win without lawyers.  These proceedings are generally called ALR’s by lawyers which is short for Administrative Law Review.

ALR’s are done in Collin and Dallas Counties like a deposition in a conference room and most lawyers advise their clients not to attend.  If the ALR Judge determines DPS lost your ALR, then your driver’s license is not suspended.  This happens all the time.

The ALR proceedings run concurrently or parallel to your criminal DWI case.  Sometimes the ALR proceedings take longer and sometimes they’re shorter.  If you win your DWI on the criminal side, the driver’s license suspension can also be negated.

*Jeremy Rosenthal is Board Certified in Criminal Law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization and licensed by the Supreme Court of Texas. Nothing in this article is intended to be legal advice.  For legal advice consult an attorney.

1 Comment | DWI, Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Permalink
Posted by Jeremy Rosenthal, Esq.

Top 5 Mistakes When Hiring A Criminal Defense Attorney Countdown — #1

February 17, 2010

By Collin County Criminal Defense Lawyer Jeremy Rosenthal

(972) 369-0577

This week I’m counting down the top 5 mistakes people make in hiring a criminal defense attorney.

#1.  Hiring a lawyer that pleads everyone guilty.

I approach every case looking for a way to win – not why we should lose.  Sometimes the paths to victory are many, sometimes they are wide, and sometimes there is just a sliver of hope.  But the slivers are there if you look hard enough. I consider pleading guilty a last-option in most instances in Texas state courts in Collin and Dallas counties.

This means I set a decent percentage of them for trials or motions to suppress.  But there are lawyers who advise their clients to plead guilty virtually every time.

I rarely question another lawyer’s professional judgment.  And let’s be straight – pleading guilty or not guilty is exclusively the client’s decision.  But a lawyer’s advice typically plays a very heavy part.

I struggle to think of reasons why a particular lawyer simply never puts the State of Texas to task.  Maybe they’re intimidated.  Maybe they lack confidence.  Maybe they’ve made the immature mistake of sitting in judgment on their client if the client used poor judgment or made a mistake.

Whatever the case may be – trial is an important option and a constitutional right.  It should at least be discussed and considered.  Not having that option severely restricts your chances for success.

The cure for this is simple.  When interviewing your lawyer you should ask them how often they take cases to trial?  When was the last time they tried a case?  How many cases like yours have they tried in the past couple of years?

The answers will be revealing.  I’m not suggesting the “tougher” lawyers are better – but you should consider hiring someone that doesn’t take options off the table and who isn’t afraid to pull the trigger and take the state to trial.

*Jeremy Rosenthal is Board Certified in Criminal Law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization and licensed by the Supreme Court of Texas. Nothing in this article is intended to be legal advice.  For legal advice consult an attorney.

1 Comment | Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Permalink
Posted by Jeremy Rosenthal, Esq.

Top 5 Mistakes in Hiring a Criminal Defense Lawyer Countdown — No. 2

February 16, 2010

By Collin County Criminal Defense Lawyer Jeremy Rosenthal

www.rosenthalwadas.com

(972) 369-0577

This Week I’m Counting Down the Top 5 Mistakes People Make When Hiring a Criminal Defense Lawyer.

#2:  Hiring a Lawyer that Gives You Unreasonable Expectations

I’m licensed to practice in Texas.  Here it is unethical for a lawyer to promise a client certain results.  I can’t imagine it’s permissible in any other state.

I often visit with people and my view of the case is much brighter and more optimistic than they anticipated.  But making a promise there is even a sliver of a chance I can’t keep helps no one.

Every single case – DWI, marijuana, felonies, or whatever, is like a snowflake.  Each set of facts has it’s own unique nuances which may turn the laws in different ways.  There’s also the unpredictability of humans such as prosecutors, witnesses and not least of all – juries.

A Doctor can’t predict how the human body will react to treatment with 100% certainty – and a lawyer can’t predict how the human judicial process will react with 100% certainty.  Good lawyers recognize the variables and do their best to put those variables in perspective.

Every lawyer takes an oath to zealously represent their client.  Any lawyer you hire should be willing to fight for you and defend your case aggressively.  A guarantee isn’t part of the equation.

Another thing to consider about a lawyer that promises results – is that it’s not smart from the lawyer’s perspective!  Even if that lawyer can deliver on their guarantee often – they’re breaking their pledge probably just as often.  If a lawyer makes a mistake like this in their own judgment – how can you expect them to be smart with your case!

 

3 Comments | crimes against children, Drugs, DWI, Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Permalink
Posted by Jeremy Rosenthal, Esq.

The Top 5 Mistakes You Can Make When Hiring a Criminal Defense Lawyer Countdown — No. 4

February 14, 2010

By Collin County Criminal Defense Lawyer Jeremy Rosenthal

texasdefensefirm.com

(972) 369-0577

This week I’m counting down the top 5 mistakes people make when choosing and hiring a criminal defense lawyer.

#4  Hiring Someone Who Only Tells You What You Want To Hear

Sometimes in life we have to choose from a bad option or a worse option.  A lawyer that needlessly sugar-coats your criminal case whether it be a DWI, a theft case, a drug possession case or a felony isn’t doing you any favors.

There’s an age-old legal saying, “he who represents himself has a fool for a client.”  One of the main reasons for this saying is having legal problems is very stressful.  A lawyer should be detached enough from your situation that they can objectively review all the sides of your case.

Every lawyer should fight relentlessly for the optimum result for their client.  I’m not suggesting otherwise.  But your lawyer must also be like a mirror and give you the most accurate reflection of your case so that decisions can be made based on reality — not fantasy.

Lawyers are just like doctors in that we have to have good bedside manners.  This means that a good lawyer is realistic about bad news and can put it in perspective.  Just because there’s a problem doesn’t mean a great goal in the case still can’t be achieved.

Be wary of a lawyer that is afraid or hesitant to disagree with you or tell you news you don’t want to hear when you’re interviewing them.

A lawyer’s ability to give unbiased, detached and unprejudiced advice is a necessity.  It is just as critical as their ability to fight for you.

*Jeremy Rosenthal is Board Certified in Criminal Law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization and licensed by the Supreme Court of Texas. Nothing in this article should be considered legal advice.  For legal advice, you should consult an attorney.

1 Comment | Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Permalink
Posted by Jeremy Rosenthal, Esq.

How Can I get a Police Report After I was Arrested?

February 12, 2010

By Collin County Criminal Defense Lawyer Jeremy Rosenthal

jeremy@texasdefensefirm.com

(972) 369-0577

Texas law makes it tougher than you might think to see your own police report.  Believe it or not it could be the middle of trial before you’re allowed to see it!

But don’t worry, in Texas state courts it rarely, if ever, happens that way regardless if it’s DWI, theft, assault, drugs or whatever.

The Michael Morton Discovery Act passed taking effect for cases filed after January 1, 2014 require the prosecutors to give your lawyer a police report upon request, though, there are limitations on to whom your lawyer can disclose the report.  You can read more about those changes here.

Two quick points — lawyers look at police reports the same way doctors look at x-rays.  We key in on things you may not notice because they’ll have legal significance.  If you don’t already have a lawyer — consider one.  Second, this discussion isn’t for traffic tickets and municipal fines in Texas though some of the same rules may apply.

Police departments don’t have to give you the report in a criminal case unlike a civil car accident.  Texas Government Code 522.108 is an exception to the Texas Public Information Act for law enforcement in criminal matters.

Many prosecuting agencies like Dallas and Ft. Worth and Collin County currently have “open file” policies meaning the defense attorney has access to the entire file.

And you do have rights in all this.  The Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Art. 39.14 provides that if you show “good cause” to the Court, the Court can order the prosecution to produce a whole laundry list of items from their file prior to trial.  The prosecutor has legal and ethical duties to produce favorable evidence to you.  Brady is generally any evidence which is exculpatory (proves innocence) or which is favorable to the defendant — though the issue is complex.

Again, without legal training and experience as a legal practitioner — getting your hands on a police report can be useless.  If the case is serious enough for you to want a police report, it’s probably serious enough for you to get a lawyer!

*Jeremy Rosenthal is Board Certified in Criminal Law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization and licensed by the Supreme Court of Texas. Jeremy is designated as a Texas Super Lawyer by Thomson Reuters.  www.texasdefensefirm.com.

1 Comment | Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Permalink
Posted by Jeremy Rosenthal, Esq.

« Previous Entries
Next Entries »